Are they now all ‘racists’?

 

How inconsiderate: couldn’t this plane crash in Russia have waited until the weekend? Now the news, the political editors and commentators in our MSM had to fill their pages with this story today – what a waste: of the weekend editions “Newspaper headlines: ‘Putin’s revenge’ and Prigozhin’s death ‘no surprise’.” (link).

This blanket coverage in the papers means that we peasants don’t need to be told about some other outrageous news, such as the head of Natwest, Dame Alison Rose, of Coutts account cancellation fame, walking off with a paypacket adding up to £11.3m, according to the DT (paywalled link).

Since the government holds 48% of NatWest stock, this news might upset some of us. The Treasury pointed out that they don’t meddle in the bank’s business, so that’s ok then. Still, the DT article is simply heaving with quotes from Tory MPs – but not one squeak is to be heard from Labour. Why is that? Is yon Dame one of their own, perchance?

I’m very much puzzled by the continuous silence of spokespeople or MPs from the Opposition. Be it the Letby murder case, be it government spending such as handing over, as a loan, a cool £192m to the Ukraine to help with their winter fuel situation: not a squeak. I am sure our MSM editors would have diligently tried to get the Opposition’s opinion on these matters. Or did they?

Perhaps the quotes from said opposition were so inane that the various news editors preferred not to publish them? There’s one such utterance of which I was unaware. It wasn’t by an opposition politician but by one of their vociferous ‘apolitical’ supporters and race mongers. It was only thanks to a reply published in the DM that I found out, in her comment piece. She also referred to an earlier report in the DT (link). I am simply speechless! Nana Akua wrote:

“Earlier this week, lawyer and political activist Dr Shola Mos-Shogbamimu published this angry and ill-lettered tweet in the wake of the murderer’s sentencing: ‘Lucy Letby exemplifies how ideology of Whiteness keeps Britain in a chokehold. They believed her tears/denials even though evidence said otherwise for no other reason than she’s White. A Black or Brown nurse would’ve been reported to the police immediately & sacked for suspicion.’.” (link)

Let that sink in: the NHS is a bastion of ‘white ideology’, so much so that ‘black or brown’ nurses are in danger of being sacked ‘for suspicion’, whatever that is supposed to mean. But this person isn’t the only one trying to make this horrendous murder case into another instance of racism. See this:

“The president of the Royal College of Nursing, Sheila Sobrany, echoed this bizarre claim, adding that one of the whistleblower doctors had been ignored because he was non-white: ‘We need to stop denying that racism is a serious issue in the NHS, this doctor would have been listened to if he was white and Lucy Letby would have been stopped sooner if she wasn’t white… Dr Ravi Jayaram was not listened to or taken seriously.’” (link)

How deep have we sunk that this horrendous case is being used for more race-hate mongering! How trustworthy are these mongers when they blithely disregard facts, documented for all to see during the court case? The first consultant to look at these murders was white, wasn’t he: how inconvenient!

Thanks to the meticulous ban on publicity, the names of parents and nurse colleagues are still unknown. Were they not I’m sure the likes of yon ‘activist’ and the head of the Royal College of Nursing would already have tried to make out Letby was ‘allowed’ to murder black babies … yes, I think the race baiters are as gruesome and unfeeling as that!

I leave you with news of a report on lockdowns. This is important because there are already reports about ‘new covid variants’ appearing. So we better be aware that, if and when it suits our overlords, lockdowns will be implemented again:

“The report involving more than 50 scientists from around the world, found that the strongest impact on coronavirus infections came from a full lockdown. Of 151 studies they considered that estimated an effect of stay at home orders, 119 found a substantial benefit, corresponding to a reduction in the “r number” — the rate of spread of the virus — by about 50 per cent. Christl Donnelly, from the University of Oxford, said lockdowns were “clearly a powerful tool [helping] to dramatically reduce risk, but also with clear detrimental consequences”.” (link, paywalled)

Never mind those ‘detrimental consequences’, never mind that the data are insecure: “Unlike with drugs or vaccines, there were few “randomised controlled trials” in which groups are assigned to either be masked or not masked, for example.”  – lockdowns ‘worked’, and ”contact tracing apps made a big difference;” (link, paywalled). So be aware that the road to new lockdowns is already being paved.

That’s all I have for today. I wonder why the usual suspects aren’t screaming that lockdowns are racist and an instrument of ‘White Patriarchy’ … Have a good day.



Print Friendly, PDF & Email