It’s always satisfactory to have proof, ‘from the horse’s mouth’ as it were, for the MSM’s selective reporting of ‘news’. Here is this morning’s collection of the print editions’ front pages, graced with the astonishing headline concocted by ‘staff’: “Newspaper headlines: Harry ‘bombshell’ and Bet Lynch’s dementia diagnosis” (link).

I’ve no idea why Sunak’s ‘initiative’ hasn’t made it into the BBC’s headline. Moreover, do the Westminster news editors really think that we plebs – those of us who can read, that is – are more interested in a TV star than the PM’s latest shenanigans?

This is even more surprising because Sunak’s ‘initiative’ relates to AI, an issue we’ve carefully been told to be afraid of. Shouldn’t any  instance of this new fear porn ‘for the masses’ be kept in the news? Anyway, here’s the headline in the Times: “US will join Rishi Sunak summit to rein in ‘existential’ AI risk” (link, paywalled). Well, isn’t that glorious! The mighty USA graciously ‘joining Sunak’ – aren’t we all proud to be British now!

There is another news item meant to keep us shivering with fear: “New technology could reveal your private thoughts, warn experts” (link, paywalled). Is this newsworthy “because: AI” – or is this about filling the pages, thanks to a government report?

The article weighs in on the ‘dangerous – be afraid’ scale, with the immediate cry for ‘guidance’ from our scientifically illiterate government:

“A report from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) says devices that can harvest information directly from the brain are set to become increasingly common. It warns that in the future they could be used to assess an individual’s mental health, their suitability for jobs and to access thoughts they might not wish to be made public.” (link, paywalled)

Are you trembling with fear yet, of having all your private thoughts revealed? Interestingly, the original report puts more weight on bias, discrimination and the urgent need for ‘regulation’:

“Discrimination in neurotechnology could occur where models are developed that contain bias, leading to inaccurate data and assumptions about people and communities. […] Neurodivergent people may be particularly at risk of discrimination from inaccurate systems and databases that have been trained on neuro-normative patterns.” (link)

I dunno what ‘neurodivergent people’ are. I suppose this is yet another example of using hifalutin’ words in order to look unbiased and inclusive because calling a spade a spade is offensive. Read the whole report to get the gist – it’s ‘careful bureaucratese’ at its finest. I am only surprised The Times avoided to copy those details.

There are two news items which I had to look up online because the reporting by our MSM was a bit … selective. One is about the fate of the DT. The grauniad and TV news stations somewhat gleefully report that they’re ‘up for sale’, e.g. the BBC:

“The Daily and Sunday Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine are set to be put up for sale due to debts owed by their parent group.” (link)

One might have thought that at least The Times would have found this worthy of a report. The DT’s editors were probably told to keep quiet. Ah well, why would the subscribers to the DT and the Speccie need to know about the fate of those publications which they support with their money!

The other item is about New York and the air quality of that place. The Times headlines their report: “People warned to stay inside as Canadian smoke engulfs New York” (link, paywalled) and writes:

“Bands of smoke stretching south from fires in Quebec led to air quality warnings from the National Weather Service for cities all along the Atlantic coast, covering a population of more than 100 million Americans. By the late afternoon New York had the worst air quality of any city in the world, surpassing Dubai, Delhi and Lahore,” (link, paywalled)

It’s clearly only newsworthy because it has now hit New York. The fate of the Canadians affected by those fires is of no interest. Only right at the bottom, hidden away, do we find the obligatory outcry:

“The New York senator Chuck Schumer called the smoke “a warning from nature that we have a lot of work to do to reverse the destruction of climate change”. (link, paywalled)

So how come, one might ask, haven’t we already been told about those wildfires which surely must have been ongoing for some time to produce such smoke? I checked out ‘sources’ on the internet, e.g. this report from NASA which shows that these fires didn’t occur overnight (link).

Why have our climate change cultists not already been hopping about because of these fires? Did they not know because it wasn’t ‘in the news’ – or are these fires only newsworthy because New York is affected?

Because our MSM insist that it’s ‘important news’, I leave you with the best headline regarding yon prince. Nothing describes better the attitude of him and his spouse – he ‘did it all for her’, you know:

“Prince Harry tells High Court judge he is not aware of ANY evidence he was hacked by the Mirror – but insists it would be an ‘injustice’ if he lost his case against them as he finishes his second day on the stand” (link)

There’s no coming back from this: he regards himself as above the law. Clearly, he’s never heard of  Magna Carta or what happened to his ancestor, King Charles I. He’s entitled and that’s that. And he demands that we, the plebs, pay for his ‘security’ … words fail me.

That’s all I have for today. I expect that we’ll soon hear more about climate change, how those wildfires are our fault for driving cars and that we need to install heat pumps immediately. wildfires have never happened before, you know!  Have a good day.