… sick of the crime, sick of the MSM’s selective reporting

 

In a comment posted yesterday morning our reader and contributor Stout Yeoman wrote about the knife attack on toddlers in a playground in the French town Annecy. Do read his comment post again, here (scroll down).

This morning we find that, either as leading article or at least as front page report, this horrible crime is on all the front pages of the print editions except for The Star: “Newspaper headlines: ‘Horror at the playground’ as British girl stabbed” (link).  

Does one have to be as cynical as me to ask if the news editors only placed their report of this crime on the top of their pages because one of the poor little tykes was ‘a British girl’? See e.g. the headline in The Times: “France stabbing: British girl among five injured in Annecy playground” (link, paywalled).

I’ll not quote details from those reports, it’s sufficient to post the headline from the DM because, as always, it’s a perfect summary:

“Syrian Christian who stabbed four children including a British two-year-old girl in playground horror had recently divorced the mother of his child and ‘was convicted of benefit fraud’ during ten-year stint as a refugee in Sweden” (link)

There is one other aspect to be emphasised: all the reports mention that this Syrian ‘refugee’ was a Christian. Apparently he had a necklace with a cross around his neck and called ‘in the name of Jesus Christ’ before he went on his stabbing spree. See e.g. the sub-headline in the DT: “Screams rang out around the sunny Annecy park as the man appeared to shout ‘in the name of Jesus Christ’, while waving his knife in the air” (paywalled link). 

Cynical old me wonders if all those news editors were glad to be able to point this out, in a change to the usual ‘religious’ shouts of other knife wielders killing and maiming in towns and cities across EU countries. I’ve not seen an admonishment that readers ought to refrain from tarring a whole religion because of one knifeman.

I am also astonished that suddenly the reports are quite clear: the terrorist was ‘a man’, not just a person – how do they know if he doesn’t self-identify as woman? They also explicitly write that he was a Syrian, not just someone of ‘asiatic origin’. Is that because he’s a self-confessed Christian?

Interestingly, one German journalist argues in a video (in German, and you need a VPN as well as a machine translator) that this fact doesn’t suit the ‘discourse’ of the French Right, as if that terrorist being ‘a Christian’ means a justified outcry from said ‘right’ is therefore not valid because, after all, they’re ‘only against muslims’.  

Of course, as Stout Yeoman already pointed out in his comment post yesterday, the fact that this ‘refugee’ who had already lived in Sweden for ten years, was convicted of benefit fraud, had been refused Swedish nationality, who happened to be able to make his way, unhindered thanks to EU ‘freedom of movement’ laws, to France where he again applied for citizenship which was refused: these are not problems to exercise the minds of opinion piece writers!

Here’s a question which puzzles me: are the huge number of ‘refugees’ which have swamped this country all innocent angels or do they commit violent crimes as well, only we’re not told because it doesn’t fit the woke image of gentle diverse ‘people’, of making us unwilling to sacrifice so much for them, or of fear of being called ‘raycisst’?

Speaking of labelling people and of discrimination, the Times has an article today which nearly made me throw my coffee cup against the wall: “Patients have no right to know if their doctor is trans, says NHS guide” (link, paywalled). This is not an original report – it is copied from the DM. Does The Times have no reporters left? Anyway, here’s the DM’s summary headline:

“Patients don’t have the right to know if their medics are transgender and may be guilty of discrimination if they ask to see another doctor – and those with dementia ‘should be challenged’ over discriminatory views, NHS warns – Guidance says patients can only request same-sex staff in limited circumstances – But they cannot make a request where there is ‘no clear clinical benefit’” (link).

Amazing, isn’t it, how the Sacred Cow, overworked as their employees all are, still finds the time to produce ‘guidance’! I am speechless to note that patients who should be able to trust their doctors have ‘no right to know’, and are guilty of ‘discriminatory views’ if they dare to ask or demand a ‘hetero-cis’ doctor. Is the NHS hell-bent on robbing us of our trust in doctors and nurses?

That’s all I have for today. In future, I shall refuse to answer any questions – be it from NHS staff, be it from council staff – about my age, race or gender because it is discriminatory. Have a good day.