All together now: “by jingo if we do …”

 

It’s ‘Conference Season’, with the Tories off to a not-so-good start. Oh, there are reports of ‘what he/she it’ said,  but it’s not really that interesting. However, our glorious MSM do try, by manufacturing some sort of Tory palace ‘revolution’, i.e. a fight for who’ll be the next PM. A glance at the print editions’ front pages was sufficient to put me right off my coffee: “Newspaper headlines: ‘Tories eye PM’s throne’ and ‘Schools phones ban’.” (link).

For some inexplicable reason it’s not worthwhile for chief editors to tell their readers that Hunt allegedly said that taxes would have to stay high. Also, why would they spend time and effort to ask why the current MoD chief, Grant Shapps, wants to send Army personnel to the Ukraine … to ‘help with training’?

Clearly, Shapps and the current crop of MSM editors are too young to recall how the USA got involved in the Vietnam war when they started sending ‘trainers’ to Saigon. It’s ‘ancient’ history now. we are told though that Shapps’ proposal has now been demoted:

“Divisions over defence emerged on the opening day of the Conservative Party conference in Manchester, with Mr Sunak playing down the prospect of UK military instructors being deployed in Ukraine after Grant Shapps, the new Defence Secretary, had floated the idea.” (paywalled link)

See – it was ‘only’ an idea which Shapps ‘floated’, but Sunak saying no is a sign of ‘division’ in the Tory Party. This is how to ‘frame the narrative’ of divisions and plottings. Right on time for the Tory Conference there’s also the former MoD Chief, Ben Wallace, who has written summink ‘for the DT’. A summary of his piece graced the top of the DT’s online edition:

“Ben Wallace has revealed that he asked Rishi Sunak to spend £2.3 billion more on military support for Ukraine before departing as Defence secretary. […] Mr Wallace said the UK had been overtaken by Germany as the biggest European military donor to Ukraine. His intervention will increase pressure on the Prime Minister to spend more money supporting Kyiv against the Russian invasion.” (paywalled link)

Clearly, “we” must not be seen to be ‘overtaken’ by Germany! Given the alleged posturing of Tory MPs plotting to become the next PM this Wallace piece is important to provide them with material. How dare the current PM refuse to spend more of our taxes on that bottomless pit:

“Whitehall debates about previous Ukraine funding have resulted in clashes between the Ministry of Defence and the Treasury, which Mr Sunak headed until July last year.”(paywalled link)

Moreover, Biden allegedly “moved to persuade Republican allies of Donald Trump to stop blocking more aid to Ukraine in a sign of splits in the West.” (paywalled link). But rest assured: we have the men and the money! After all, some of our Armed Forces are being sent out on a NATO ‘adventure’ because: why not! Here’s the headline in the DT:

“Nato confirms 600 British soldiers will be deployed in Kosovo – It comes as Aleksandar Vucic, Serbia’s president, denied reports Belgrade was increasing the number of troops near the Kosovo border” (paywalled link)

Between ever increasing ‘poor refugees’ arriving here, needing to be housed and fed – paid for by us plebs – and the demands from the Wallaces and Shapps’ of this country, supported by commentators and comment post writers in a concerted action where even the tiniest bit of criticism is followed by howls of “putinista!!”, I can’t help but recall a verse in a music hall siong of the 19th century. You can read the history of it, and why it’s “Constantinople” here. The verse goes:

“We don’t want to fight but by Jingo if we do,
We’ve got the ships, we’ve got the men, we’ve got the money too,
We’ve fought the Bear before, and while we’re Britons true,
The Russians shall not have Constantinople.” (link)

“Jingoism” used to be despised by the lefty, ‘educated’ middle classes. It seems that the current crop, be they MSM writers, be they politicians in the Uniparty, have already forgotten that they used to howl whenever they spied ‘jingoism’. 

And so we find that jingoism is back in fashion, that high taxes are fine because alleviating the burden on the ordinary, tax-paying peasants, is unnecessary when “we” can indulge in a bit of sabre rattling and showing the Krauts what’s what. Never mind that “we” don’t have the ships, the men or indeed the money any longer …

That’s all I have for today and for the next days. For health reasons I need to curtail my writing. Thus, there won’t be a ‘daily rant’ but only a couple or so in this and the coming weeks. As usual, you’ll get a notification whenever a new piece comes out, so don’t worry – you won’t miss anything. Meanwhile, talk amongst yourselves in the comments. Have a good day and week.