Mrs May said 109 times at the Despatch Box in the House of Commons that the United Kingdom would leave the European Union on the 29th March 2019, in accordance with the provisions of Article 50 in the Treaty of Lisbon. But the EU has brushed its own Article 50 aside at Mrs May’s request. Britain did not leave the EU on 29th March because Mrs May’s misnamed Withdrawal Agreement with Angela Merkel has not yet got through the House of Commons.
The true name for Mrs May’s Withdrawal Agreement is the Withdrawal (of Democracy) Agreement. It sets up a Joint Committee in Whitehall (Articles 164 to 169) to rule the relationship between the EU and the UK throughout the transition period (Articles 7&131), which it will extend to 31st December 2099 (Article 132). Clause 2 of Article 166 says that its decisions will “be binding” on the EU & UK; in other words, this Joint Committee will overrule the British government.
As the Court of Justice of the EU will resolve all disputes between the EU and UK sides of this Joint Committee (Articles 168 & 174), this committee will be the means whereby the EU will impose Direct Rule on the UK. Direct Rule by the EU will make Parliament in Westminster redundant, and the proceedings of the Joint Committee will be “confidential”, in other words, secret (clause 10 of Annex VIII).
The actual existence of this Joint Committee may also be secret, and it has never been mentioned by the BBC so far. Ignorance in Britain of the contents of the Withdrawal Agreement is understandably almost universal, as few people, and least of all MPs, have the patience to read through its 585 pages of dense Teutonic verbiage. So ironically MPs who voted against Mrs May’s misnamed Withdrawal (EU) Bill are mistakenly accused of voting to stop Britain escaping from the EU.
Mrs May and the rest of the Remain MPs in the Commons, at least three-fourths of the total number there, will do anything to avoid No Deal (with the EU). No Deal is the WTO Deal, the terms of trade of the World Trade Organisation, by which those countries outside the EU, the majority in the world, trade with the EU. Those terms of trade are the General Agreements on Terms of Trade, known as GATT, which have been reached in the eight rounds of international GATT negotiations since the late 1940s. The WTO oversees the operation of GATT, and all the major trading states in the world belong to the WTO. The EU itself belongs to the WTO, and so is subject to the World Trade Court of the WTO in Geneva. Since the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, the EU’s share of world trade has fallen by half.
If Britain leaves the EU without Parliament agreeing to the EU deal (Mrs May’s misnamed Withdrawal Agreement) and opts for the WTO deal instead, then Britain will regain its independence. It will become self-governing like other countries outside the EU that trade with the EU under WTO rules. Once out of the EU, British voters will be able to vote their sovereign government in a sovereign Parliament out of office as they could before 1973 whereas British voters can never vote the EU Commission out of office now.
Because the Leave victory on the 23rd June 2016 showed the British people to be unreliable subjects of the EU, the EU will withdraw democracy from the UK. And that is what Mrs May’s Withdrawal Agreement is for. The Joint Committee junta in it will abolish democracy. That is why Mrs May doesn’t care about the electoral consequences of her alliance with Jeremy Corbyn to get her (Anti)Withdrawal Agreement through the Commons. Because once her egregious Agreement gets through Parliament, the Tory & Labour and other parties will not matter anymore, and neither will elections or the electorate. They will all be trumped by the Joint Committee, and the EU has now given Mrs May until next Halloween to get her Agreement through Parliament.
The Withdrawal (of democracy) Agreement is Whitehall’s response to the 23rd June 2016. The EU has always been the bureaucrats’ idea of Heaven, and Whitehall bureaucrats feel far more loyalty to their opposite numbers in the EU than to the British electorate, who they regard as ignorant yokels. The Referendum victory for Leave showed that the Commons could soon have a majority of Leave MPs. So the EU had to act fast.
Mrs May’s mission from Angela Merkel is to force her Agreement through Parliament as the EU’s Final Solution to the British Problem. And in that mission to withdraw democracy, she has the support of those MPs in the Commons who campaigned for Remain before the 23rd June 2016. Remain MPs would much rather be ruled by EU bureaucrats, than by the dangerously unpredictable and swinish multitude of British voters.
Remain MPs regard the vote for British Home Rule on the 23rd June 2016 as a racist & xenophobic Hate Crime. Consequently, Remain MPs are wary of the ballot box itself and see universal suffrage as a dangerous indulgence of populism. Populism gives a voice to the vulgar, plebeian concerns of the common herd, and those concerns can speak through the ballot box, as they did on the 23rd June 2016.
Whitehall and Westminster both agree that the 2016 Referendum revolt showed that British voters are dangerously patriotic. Better therefore that democracy is withdrawn altogether through the covert imposition of direct EU rule through a secret junta. The Joint Committee in Mrs May’s Withdrawal (of Democracy) Bill is just the junta to do that; it is a masterpiece of bureaucratic cunning.
I would seriously like Michael Shrimptons take on this
Good point TG. I believe he may be contacted at michael@mshrimpton.co.uk or maybe via Veterans Today.
The mystery to me is why so many Conservative MPs have now voted for the WA, that is the third vote? Such as Johnson, JRM and Raab. This is the the point that needs to be aired. I do not mean open the box I mean smash the box and spew its contents.
I have argued about making Pamphlets before and been dismissed by some. TGS talks of text books and I fully agree in princilple. We need to get the written word ou, it is, in my mind, very important. But people will not read a book and a Leaflet will just not give the breadth of information.
We need to become Pamphleteers!
Kin,
I wonder if we gave out a series of leaflets coplete with page numbers to make them collectable. There’s fun. A bit like old cigarette Cards.
Great! We need to be imaginative. There is so much that can be done.
I have a question. Every so often I read something along the lines that if we are still in the EU (or under the Lisbon Treaty by some other means) in 2020 a new phase of the Lisbon treaty kicks in and we automatically become a mere province in the EU and the countries of our union are no longer countries. If this is true it would explain all May’s delays.
I’d really appreciate someone with knowledge on this providing clarification as it’s rather important. Someone also needs to check Mays Withdrawal Agreement (Treaty) to see if it contains something similar hidden in the small print.
I apologise if I’m sounding paranoid but May’s taken Never Trust a Tory to a whole new level.
Good thought Michael.. Well spotted. , I’ll make c omment on a Torquil Etc article. He would know.
Shouldn’t UKIP h.O. be spewing this sort of thing out each in its own position in its text book.as an example of the damaging and anti business, and anti british uncertainty she is generating every day..
Is there nobody who will get rid of this bloody stupid housewife from Downing Street, or do we have to continue as the world’s joke Nation for even longer ?
She may be stupid but I do not think she is.
On the contrary she is cunning, crafty, devious and a master of disguising her true intentions which are to lock us into the EU permanently. She is completely wrapped up in the EU and its direction of travel.
The Withdrawal Agreement locks us in as subsidiary associates, without a voice, but totally under their control. The Joint Committee puts us into a serf position. Sir John Redwood has put a very good analysis of the Agreement on his blog. No right minded person, never mind an MP, would ever sign it once they have read the provisions it contains unless they wanted to put us into the European superstate as an integral part of the project.
I believe Mrs May is absolutely wedded to the European project and is pulling every string, every muscle and every bribe she can muster to get this “deal” through the House of Commons and the ultimate plan is to rejoin as a full member in a couple of years.
That is all she cares about – apart from LBGT issues.
She might appear to be stupid but the real issue is that she is a traitor reporting to the EU / globalists.
The Remain ideology is an extension of Continental State/Corporate collectivist romantic Fascism.
Its vehicle is the brainwashing of privileged elite (considering themselves to be unremovable high-intellect technocratic ‘experts’ whose views matter more than “ordinary people” via 3rd-Way (fabianist) revolutionary social engineering by stealth, designed (as HGWells the leading 1930s exponent of Fabianism) said “New Republicans” “will constitute an informal and open freemasonry. In all sorts of ways they will be influencing and controlling the apparatus of the ostensible governments…” “..“we can weave a world system of monetary and economic activities, while the politicians, the diplomatists, and the soldiers are still too busy with their ancient and habitual antics to realise what we are doing”
This “open conspiracy,” according to Wells, was “not a project to overthrow existing governments by insurrectionary attacks, but to supersede them by disregard. It does not want to destroy them or alter their forms but to make them negligible by replacing their functions”.
There was always a closeness between the 30s Fabian aristocratic Left-Wing Bloomsbury class and the continental fascists, Lloyd George was a great admirer of Hitler, the Miss Jean Brodies and other lovers of utopianism, and the extreme EU-nationalism of Remain is another version of this tendency to despotism and the arrogant view that social darwinist/Liberal ideals are a “struggle towards a more enlightened society” – ie one where any other views can get you locked up or killed. They are more than prepared to create havoc, mayhem and leave a trail of collateral damage strewn along the wayside as May has been doing to fulfil her nasty little dream.. “… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)
What is so weird is that most Tories actually believe that their 3rd-Way corporatism is Conservatism!!! It could not be more opposite.
The whole country is being brainwashed.
I have yet to see the pitfalls of Treason May’s anti-democratic Withdrawal deal examined and made clear to the general public in any of the ‘lamestream; media outlets, proof indeed that most of the MSM is heavily Remain biased.
There is clearly a deliberate campaign to prevent the fill horrors of the WA being made known, even Wasteminster, except for Bill Cash MP, has deliberately refrained from pushing.for full disclosure of the Attorney General’s legal advice on the WA as a whole. We have only ever heard the advice on the Backstop element of the deal.
However, as with Cameron’s pseudo renegotiation, the Remain Project Fear Referendum campaign and now May’s deceit the ‘establishment’ cannot control the internet. The internet is the place where those seriously concerned can find the information they need to make informed decisions.
This excellent article, and other similar ones’, need to be plastered all over the internet.
Here is a letter from John Redwood to the Attorney General about the WA: http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2019/04/15/letter-to-the-attorney-general-about-the-legal-impact-of-signing-the-wrongly-named-withdrawal-treaty/#comments
Now is the time that Junker will offer certain reforms of the EU. to get closer to democracy. and maybe an apology for mass immigration. ( although tat would be a bitter pill ) but.
Not all at once.
They ( EU Civil Service ) will drag it out for all the obvious reasons. But at every stge they’ll give a bit They do not understand that this would be counter productive. and the Brits have the bit betwwe their teeth. .
But at the same time reform of Brit democracy must be given proper reform . Not the crazyness of UKIPs idiotic manifesto option but serious..
Text books are all that is left.
I find it impossible to credit the WA.
Logic; Mrs and the EU are betting total subjucation of Britain. ( WA )
Against
Destruction of the EU.
This is palpable nonsense.
No body knows anything more ( even MPs ) except Mrs and the Civil Service.
This will fall apart. Maybe MPs are applying a tin opener
What she’s doing requires fanatacism.
Has she ever shown that much favour to EU ?
Whatever her motives she is crazy and doesn’t care any more. Except perhaps some twisted Civil Service anti british agenda.
God help us.
The EU referendum outcome was seen as a crisis for the political and coporate elites. Is Mrs May’s Withdrawal (from democracy) Agreement an example of the application of the old adage of never letting a crisis go to waste i.e accomodate the British political establishmen and the EU’s desire to demonstrate that never again will any member state attempt to leave the EU?
If the planned “Joint Committee” comes into being then our only course to save our country is direct action against it, assuming it can be identified and found. Clearly any democratic response will have been taken off the table.
I hope that:
1. May and the EU realise this and desist.
2. People are willing to do whatever is necessary to save our country.
I’m sure no-one wants such an outcome but we will have been forced into it unless we accept government by a foreign power for evermore.
It’s interesting how the police are responding to the demonstrations in London this week. Apparently, if the demo is peaceful and not violent, there’s not much they can do. And when the police go in to arrest them, the protester being arrested goes totally limp and the police have to lift a dead weight, which is not easy. Lessons learnt?
if you think that would apply to anti eu demonstrations you would be wrong . It would be macron type policing and don’t forget there are 9,000 eu police and 15’ooo eu troops in the uk now and have been for 12 days
“Remain MPs regard the vote for British Home Rule on the 23rd June 2016 as a racist & xenophobic Hate Crime.”
Well then, just to add fuel to the fire.
This’ll make you blood boil. You have to go out to work your fingers to the bone and struggle to make ends meet to pay this lot to sit at home and have children. The numbers are frightening.
“How the British Welfare System Favours Muslims”
https://youtu.be/PeZW1XVv3WQ
This one talks about Theresa May and will also make your blood boil.
“Blaming White People for Multicultural Failures”
https://youtu.be/0elT6-31Af0
I guess that most of us knew it was bad but it seems far worse than we could ever have imagined.
I never realised..
I have been saying that Education is the key.
Everythingwe discuss is capable of being Printed.
A simple text-booklet of these facts.covering all aspects of our liberals ideas would be far better than our manifesto or the myriad leaflets. The facts are inarguable ( Prove ’em including bibliography ONS, Hansard etc. ( not news )
A School textbook for the british vs propoganda.
Perfect for education but politics is speeches. And teachers can no longer be trusted with childrens minds..
Well said. But people haven’t got the patience to read a whole book anymore. How about Pamphlets!?!