Sir,
I have been moved to write once again to my MP. This time in protest about the Vaccine Passport proposals for which they are endeavouring to muster support by yet another ‘consultation’. As she is a ‘Madam MInister’ I doubt she will vote against the proposal. But at least my protest will have been made (and hopefully logged).
Here’s the letter:
Dear Ms Whately
I have filled in my response to (yet another!) consultation on Vaccine Passports (due to close on 11th October 2021.
This is the third time I have responded to a consultation on Vaccine Passports. My answers remain always the same. Such a device would be an abomination. It would create and confirm a divided society – separating the politically correct ‘clean’ from the politically ‘beyond the pale unclean’. And yet the incidence of COVID arising amongst those who have been ‘double vaccinated’ is very high indeed!
This abomination is proposed because of the incidence of a virus that has proved to be no more virulent that a ‘bad ‘flu year’ and has (similarly to such ‘flu years) affected mostly the very old and infirm and those with serious underlying health concerns! Others in the population have normally recovered with bed rest, fluids and paracetamol based medications.
To suggest ‘vaccination’ of children is heinous and unacceptable. Children have developing immune systems. They are not yet fully matured human beings. The proposal to ‘jab’ them with an experimental MRNA gene modifying substance is indefensible. The likelihood of adverse reactions particularly in the case of heart damage is unacceptably high. Government should desist from this proposal (which has not been given full and unqualified approval by JCVI) forthwith!
Figures and statistical reports are now coming to light that question the way in which the COVID virus was handled. The undue doomsday significance that was attributed to it being to look very tenuous. Additionally, the way in which the elderly were treated and the questionably large usage of Midazolam begins to look very serious indeed!
To introduce such a device as Vaccine Passports into Britain (supposedly the Mother of Democracy and Land of the Free!) would put the country into the same classification as the old “Iron Curtain” lands whose treatment of their citizens raised such anger and disdain from the then ‘enlightened’ Western Civilisations!
Questions are indisputably being asked as to why the government is so hell-bent on the introduction of such documentation (and such questions are rightly asked indeed)! The maintenance of high numbers of PCR tests which produces the attribution of ‘cases’ from so-called ‘positive’ results (however tenuous) has been under the spotlight for some time now. The figures make no distinction between ‘positive results’ that do not lead to serious illness as opposed to ‘real cases’ that do ultimately need hospital treatment. Similarly, information regarding hospitalisation figures where there might only be a short visit and consultation leading to early discharge as opposed to ‘cases’ that ultimately result on hospital bed stays is not openly published.
The inference being drawn is that government has an ‘agenda’ to bring in full ‘Identification Papers’ under the guise of protecting the community from a COVID virus (that appears now to be in retreat with reducing severity). The Social Credit system operated by China appears to hold some attraction for the government. For a ‘Conservative’ government to be adopting a policy that is more readily associated with Marxist dogma there can be no acceptable explanation!
I therefore, wish you to vote against this Vaccine Passport proposal in the House next week.
I noted that at the end of the ‘consultation’ form there was a message that implied that one could review and print ones submissions. I (and many others who have commented on their experience of completing this consultation form) find that this is not proving possible to achieve! Could it be that some submissions are more equal (and therefore acceptable!) than others? Do submissions that do not align themselves with the government wishes get sidelined or find their way into the ‘glory hole’?
Your comments will be read with interest
Yours truly etc …”
This consultation is still open – some of you have already submitted their comments. I hope this will encourage other readers to put pen to paper as well.
Respectfully, Frederica
~~~ *** ~~~
Ed: here’s the link to that government consultation for those who’ve not seen it yet: https://consultations.dhsc.gov.uk/61497f68de8e5f098521be3a
no doubt the Dickhead of the yard will order arrest all they can and hand over to the friends of Wayne Cuzzins.
much better then clearing the roads of Obstruction rebellion
The very idea of forcibly or other coercion by any means to medicate perfectly healthy people is an anathema. It is a simple moral question. What lies above and beyond these pointless yet totalitarian proposals, is the right of perfectly healthy individuals to go about their lawful business without harassment or invasive and discriminatory practices acting against them. These proposals are a threat to freedom and individual responsibility for no good reason.
Previous enaction of legislation to allow the authorities to secure, incarcerate and treat individuals could only be applied to people who were demonstrably and diagnosed with an illness of such severity that it would present an immediate risk to others. Such a restriction on individual freedoms has never been applied to people, with the justification of global healthcare, who were perfectly healthy. The government proposals would likely be declared unlawful, in time, adding to the ever-increasing list of such declarations against this government. Next time severe penalties might be imposed.
The reality is that mortality from (not with) Covid-19 amongst unvaccinated people, is less than that of flue and many other viral or bacterial infections. Not only doesn’t it justify the restriction of freedom for an individual it fails to justify any restrictive actions at all. Most hospitalisations and consequential mortality are amongst those who are a) elderly, infirm and had reached the natural end of their lives and b) those that have already been vaccinated.
The first reason not to proceed with the coercive measures of a ‘lepers’ pass is, therefore, that the risk to unvaccinated and normal healthy people is miniscule. To protect vaccinated people is a nonsense in itself, though the contradictory argument that the vaccine works wonderfully and yet doesn’t work has been relentlessly put. Governments have no business in discriminating against healthy people.
The PCR test is flawed. Everybody knows that and Kary Mullis explained it’s unsuitability for this purpose before he died. The FDA are to ban the use of PCR testing from the end of this year. No credence should be given to a test that doesn’t work. The injury reports from the vaccine out number previous vaccines multiple times. It is dangerous, the manufacturers warn against blood clots, over 1,500 people have died shortly after having the vaccine. If it had been any other time the rollout would have been stopped months ago.
The second reason to scrap vaccine passports is that it kills and injures far too many people for it to be a mandatory intervention.
Currently Sweden has no restrictions whatsoever. They never had a lockdown and never mandated mask wearing. It is a panacea of freedom to walk freely and go anywhere with no mask wearer’s other than the obligatory propaganda convert.
The third reason not to impose vaccine passports is that it achieves absolutely nothing in terms of healthcare. Sweden is a wonderful control group, so take note.
Thank you Frederica I would also like to use your letter as a template if possible please. I have also signed the petition abolishing the coronavirus act and passed it around.
Lisa please feel free to use all or any of the letter for your own purpose! Unless the numbers on that petition rise to much greater heights I think it will sink without trace. I do wonder whether some of these petitions do get nobbled as has been suggested by L Jones below!
Frederica – Stop kidding yourself. You KNOW that your MP and my MP cares not one jot for what you or I want. What HE/SHE wants is to be employed for as long as possible as near to the centre of government as he/she can, and then to be the Party candidate in your/my constituency next time around. Period. Fullstop. End of.
In recognition of loyal service to the Party, the really paid for MPs aspire to a seat in the Lords and many achieve their ambition. Others settle for the greasy pole of ‘office’ in the Commons, and we all know how unreliable an achievement that can be. Your MP/my MP was selected by a group of somebody else. Your role and mine is to accept or reject ALL the party manifesto, warts and all. Alternatively, we can vote ‘none of the above’ or to not vote at all. Our TRUE choice is to select an Independent from within the constituency rather than accept the Party candidate, and work like billio to get that local choice elected.
Helen Olivia Bicknell Whately is a British Conservative Party politician who was appointed by Boris Johnson as Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury on 16 September 2021 as part of the 2021 British cabinet reshuffle. (Wikipedia)
Need I say more?
Michael I am not kidding myself in any way! I do know that ‘they’ have only their own interests at heart at all times! But…..If we sit quiet and make no attempt to remonstrate with them, they will be justified in thinking that we dont care!!! Whatever anodyne comments they write back to us (and mine does write back in the most bland and self satisfied way), I believe that they do take note of our comments just in case the numbers of adverse constituents begins to look as though their sinecures are not quite what they thought they were! It costs me nothing but time to write. So as long as I have a complaint to make I will continue to write and let Madam know that I am not happy!
Thanks, Frederica. You are right and you are right also to continue making your points as you see fit. I am just so sick and tired of the whole charade we call democracy when, in reality, we refer only to suffrage. My disagreement is with the system, not with you. Sadly, it is also true that if we continue to do as we’ve always done, we’re likely to get what we’ve always got. And the big question then, is: “Is that good enough?”
Frederica, an excellent letter, much better than anything I could compose. May I have your permission to print and forward to my MP – JRM, acknowledging of course that it is your work.
As for Harry! Seems to me he is probably a graduate of the Frankfurt School and a member of Common Purpose. He is certainly a brainwashed lemming- gutless as well.
I shall write to ID with a list of questions for those who worship the Covid Cult.
Dear Ernest. No problem. Feel free to use the letter. No need for acknowledgement at all it wasn’t copyrighted!!!! I know there are folks on here who do not believe that letters to MPs make any difference. But….conversely, if we make no noise at all, ‘they’ may justly say that we were silently complicit and in agreement with their actions! Which, of course, we are not!!! Ye they are a load of freeloaders and self interested shysters but we must not let them think that we are not watching and waiting for the chance to bring them down!
An excellent letter. I wrote to Julian Smith – who was my MP in Ripon before I moved recently – four times in the course of the “lockdowns” (read Lock-ups) to query – much in the same vein as you, and politely but with clear supporting evidence and concise arguments – the logic and scientific rationale behind the various measures (which we know do not and did not stack up in any provable way to defend the vulnerable, reduce spread, diminish its consequences or protect all of us by promoting healthy lifestyles and the exercise of rational free behaviour. I pointed out that such measures, predicated as they have been on the “necessity” of their introduction because of an alleged pandemic that has never actually been one in the true sense of the word, and on the liking of unelected “experts” to wield excessive control over the minds and bodies of freeborn people – in direct opposition to the all the precepts of the English Constitution, not to mention international laws regarding human rights etc., and knowing that the whole point of the UN-driven exercise was to use a “pandemic” excuse precisely in order to drive forward a “reset” that has never been mandated by any democratic process anywhere on Earth – showing that the Government is in fealty, not to its own people, but to powerful and sometimes dangerous, unaccountable and vested-interest corporations and individuals, that this was tantamount to coup of Parliament by the said shadowy figures, and that he should at the very least demand that the COUNTRY is allowed to decide whether they agree with this wholesale sell-off of influence.
He was curt and dismissive, using a template email to send me “fact-checked” links to BBC and other MSM sites that we already know are in league with these preposterous and dangerous activities by Government. I replied each time to ask that he answer my questions. He never did, and clearly has no real scientific understanding nor awareness of the gravity of what he is allowing to happen. As I became more frustrated, I then mentioned that the action shown by his party’s Government in driving forward this anti-scientific agenda, using “science” as its justification, was a kind of State Corporate Fascism (which it is by any sort of comparison or knowledge of what Hard Left Socialist Fascism is as defined by the likes of Mussolini, Peron, Che Guevara etc) of a very pernicious sort.
Clearly he has not even the most basic realisation that this globalist 3rd-Way corporatist elitism is exactly what the Tories and Labour have joined forces to inflict on us.
We need to elect some kind of coalition of ReformUK, UKIP, and other freedom-supporting parties (that we know have wide support across all sections of society and all ethnic backgrounds and ages) and get rid of these new Aristocrats of technocratic tyranny.
Peter if only the ‘alternative’ parties would agree to get together and form a working coalition we might well get somewhere towards removing the ‘pinko party stranglehold on this Country! I long for the day when they all come to their senses and storm just such a group for the benefit of Britain!
WELL DONE FREDERICA !! And well done Viv for that link. That’s the one I used to answer their ‘consultation’.
Frederica has clearly been looking very deep into the whole Covid19 scam and the use of it being made by our government.
For instance, the large use of Midazolam has not been mentioned on here before but after a quick search I agree it looks very suspicious indeed. I was probably ‘treated’ with that once, some years back. At that time I was not ‘old enough’ for ‘them’ to justify ‘palliative end of life care’!
Incidentally, I also found it NOT POSSIBLE to review or print my responses. I fully agree Federica with your suggestion as to why that is.
Pauline, I couldn’t print or review mine either. Being cautious, I’d copied them already. This is what I said:
No one should be excluded from anywhere because he or she has made the informed decision, after weighing up the evidence, not to take the ‘vaccine’. Vaccine passports would introduce a two-tier society and are wholly undesirable. We are all capable of making our own decisions about our health and what we feel safe doing.
I don’t think anyone should be required to show that they are vaccinated in order to keep their jobs. There was no option to say this in the last question, which will skew the results of this questionnaire.
In a free country, no one should be compelled to have a medical procedure in order to be allowed to work. Especially an experimental vaccine which does not stop you catching or passing on the disease, and which has not been tested at all for possible long term adverse effects.
Vaccine passports are a bad, bad idea. Bad for business, bad for society, bad for freedom. And they won’t persuade me to have the ‘vaccine’. Quite the reverse.
What could we do better?
Make sure you offer all possible options to answering a question. And pay attention to the responses you get, even if you don’t like them. But I get the feeling this government has already made its decision, and vaccine passports will be introduced whatever anyone says.
Well said Xantilor. I may have been a trifle more blunt about how the Civil Service has always used obfuscation to get the response they want.
But many of my comments throughout ‘pinned them down’ on the matter of personal freedom and the Nuremberg Code etc.
You are right. They are going to be imposed on us whatever anyone says. Unless the present government is toppled damn quick from within.
Good for you Xantilor! I should have had the sense to do the same thing. My only excuse is that I found the link late at night and being a bit on the weary side I simply filled in the form without thinking twice about the fact that (it being a government issued thing) it was bound to be skewed to their advantage! My cousin must have been far more explicit in her views…..she told me that the form threw her out before she got to the end!!!!
Last sentence. That’s interesting. What happened exactly I wonder.
PS How’s your husband?
We need general ID cards so we can know who should be in this country and who shouldn’t. There’s millions who shouldn’t that need to be rounded up and deported.
Only the irresponsible, ignorant, anti-social and cowardly anti-vaxers don’t want vaccine passes. The rest of us need to know the unclean amongst us and that we’re not sharing enclosed spaces with them.
Perhaps you would be more at home in N. Korea.
I’m a bit tempted Jack Thomas to prescribe Midazolam for Harryagain he is very prone to extreme anxiety isn’t he.
Oh Pauline…..ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Very funny! And so true! You are naughty …….but I like you!
Thanks love. Reciprocated!
“irresponsible, ignorant, anti-social” – I think you forgot to include “freedom-loving, independent-thinking, authority-questioning and tyranny-intolerant rebels”. But “cowardly”? How cowardly do you have to be to want to give up your and our right to independence of thought and expression just in case you might catch the equivalent of flu?
What, no whipping of the masses today Harry? Must be coming down with something if he isn’t indulging in his flagellation.
I regret to say Harryagain that your comment exemplifies the very problem with have with apartheid in the UK. To suggest anyone that refuses to take part in a highly experimental medical procedure is unclean really is the most despicable comment.
I can agree however that general ID cards could be beneficial but if those that are challenged and found to be here illegally it is very easily established without the need for everyone to carry their “papers”.
In time I suspect you come to come realise that these vaccines are causing more problems than they are curing as the winter season approaches and the numbers with weak immune systems turn out to be those that are fully vaccinated.
AS ID cards, like NI cards, will be dished out like confetti, we will still be plagued with illegals who just lie their way into the system. It is not about identification of British subjects, it is control of all aspects of our lives, including monetary. Be careful what you wish for Harryagain.
We are having to fight the authorities on a broad front.
One of the key means of winning this fight is to abolish the Coronavirus Act, which is responsible for so much of this government’s authoritarian approach to covid-19.
We need to be asked for our consent on this important matter and we need to bring about free, open, honest and fair debate about covid-19 policies.
A key way of doing this is to have a Referendum on abolishing the Coronavirus Act , so please sign this Petition to that effect, which has just started:
Your petition is on live: Referendum in the United Kingdom to abolish the Coronavirus Act. – Petitions (parliament.uk)
Anthony Webber
anthonywebber@cwgsy.net
Thank you Anthony. I have found and signed the petition and will ensure that it gets passed around.
Thank you Anthony, signed.
No sorry, me or my system unable to find it. Please give more help.
YES Now I have. The magic word was referendum.
Thanks for the heads up Anthony. I have signed and passed it on round the family. Will spread the word further as the days go on.
Mr Webber – I signed it quite a while ago, and shared it as much as possible. It is growing quite suspiciously slowly. I think I’m getting paranoid – I don’t believe there’s anything now that won’t be nobbled if it doesn’t serve the narrative.
It is funny you should say that L Jones. I sign quite a few of these petitions and I keep them open so I can see the progress of numbers signing. Several times recently I have noted that the number of signatories when I previously checked had dropped when I went back to look again. Now, it is possible that the system might have discovered some unauthorised signatures had slipped through the net (they don’t apply the Captur system to rule out robot signatures) but, my money is on the system being nobbled as you suggest!
the history books will record this as a crime against humanity; see this:
PHYSICIANS DECLARATION
GLOBAL COVID SUMMIT – ROME, ITALY
https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/
Very interesting Flyer but I so far don’t see any signatories from the UK. It says thousands of others but….it would be good to see actual numbers rather then that loose throw away that thousands have signed. Somehow I cant see it having a large uptake in the UK. Most of the medical folks here seem sold on the ‘common purpose’ theme of compliance!!