I remember, it must have been back in the 80s, watching a TV documentary where a what can only be described as a very uneducated and probably unemployed man saying that the state should provide for all of his needs.
This person sat on a couch in his council house, he looked very unfit, and his belly hung over his belt. He was complaining that he needed a bigger house because he had four children with another on the way, he felt that it was the duty of the state to provide a bigger home and feed his growing family.
Then of course, back in the eighties, we used to complain of ‘breed to feed’ mothers, young women that by their late teens to early twenties would have several children by several different fathers and all to get a council house and increase their benefits. In both of the above cases, more often than not, the children would be left to run riot and would end up just as uneducated as their parents, perhaps dealing in drugs before finally ending up in prison on a regular and ongoing basis.
At the time I was outraged beyond belief, I have children, but in spite of my faults, I never felt that I had the right to breed like a rabbit and expect others to pay. When I had children it was a well-considered decision, their mother and I considered our finances, and how much it would cost to support and educate them, we encouraged them to do well in life, and they certainly are too.
Well, that’s Socialism for you, completely unsustainable as always. As if we didn’t have enough welfare to pay for with expanding council estates of drug dealing and unemployed youths. This wasn’t enough for successive governments as they moved slowly to the Left, no doubt guided by the growing presence of the European Union.
Our EU obsessed politicians are now committed – although they would never admit it – to Third World immigration and no doubt eventually to completely open borders. From Breitbart:
“600,000 Migrants Enter Britain in One Year”
Apparently, the net migration figure was well over a quarter of a million after 343000 thousand emigrated – as I did and anyone with any sense would.
And do they ever breed, it’s difficult to find figures for immigrants generally but I recently wrote an article called: ‘The Caliphate Britannia’ that suggests – I’d be grateful if someone could confirm my figures, but I’m sure they’re not too far out – that nearly 80% of Muslim women and well over 60% of Muslim men are unemployed. With Muslim families normally having 6 to 8 children who themselves often end up on benefits, you don’t have to be a genius to see that what was once unsustainable has now become a journey on the road to perdition.
There’s an article here from ZeroHedge that caught my eye because it reminded me of all of the reasons that I left Great Britain twenty years ago. I could see what was coming down the pike then.
“Forget “Money” – What Will Matter Are Water, Energy, Soil, & Food… And A Shared National Purpose”
In these survival programs that you see on the likes of the discovery channel, people go into the wilder, remoter places of our world equipped with tools, food or the means to obtain it, stuff like that, never with a bag of dollar bills or any other Fiat currency. You cannot survive on worthless currency.
What the above article suggests is that the countries that will become the superpowers of tomorrow are those with surplus amounts of water, energy, grain, cereals, and agricultural land and there are remarkably few of them. Certainly, Great Britain is no longer one of them. It has been a long time since our country produced enough food and other resources to feed and supply its population.
As our industry has migrated overseas, our population has increased dramatically through immigration and rapidly reproducing immigrants. Now not only are we supposed to go to work to feed our own unemployed and their children, but we’re also expected to work extra hard to feed those of the third world.
As I wrote in my article some time ago: ‘Surviving the human tsunami’ the population of the Third World is growing exponentially at a frightening rate, whole populations in their desperation to escape will never stop turning up on our shores. Now when a child is born in deepest darkest Africa, we’re expected to pay and we cannot.
What I predict will happen is that when this era of money printing is over – it won’t be long now, and it always does end – resources will get very scarce. When this happens and the state can no longer provide, the to be expected competition for resources will further polarise already divided ethnic communities and they will compete along ethnic lines: then the blood will start to flow.
It seems that the politicians that sold us out to Socialist organisations like the European Union found the Champagne Socialism lifestyle just too much of a temptation.
There are numerous articles that discuss the treason that took us into the European Union; you may find this one interesting:
Was Britain Taken Into The EU Illegally?
I’ve read estimated amounts of the amount Edward Heath was bribed with to take us into the European Union; the consensus is around 1.5 million pounds. Given that in the 70s there were around 54 million people in Great Britain, it seems that the value that Edward Heath and probably many other politicians placed on our lives was around tuppence.
-“And do they ever breed, it’s difficult to find figures for immigrants generally but I recently wrote an article called: ‘The Caliphate Britannia’ that suggests – I’d be grateful if someone could confirm my figures, but I’m sure they’re not too far out – that nearly 80% of Muslim women and well over 60% of Muslim men are unemployed. ”
I’m not sure if you’ve ever read it, but I recall David Vincent’s book “2030: Your Childrens Future In Islamic Britain” mentioning similar figures.
He claims that a lot of Muslim women are simply not permitted to leave the house and find work, so naturally they just spend their time popping out kids.
Meanwhile I suspect that a lot of Muslim men who claim to be ‘unemployed’ are actually in some form of ‘off-the-books’ employment.
I’m reminded of an occasion many years ago shortly after I walked out of a job at a local car parts shop following a disagreement with my employer. I was in Oldbury Jobcentre with a friend of mine and we were looking through the vacancies available while we waited our turn to ‘sign-on’. To my amazement I watched as one of my former customers – a Pakistani taxi-driver – casually walked in and within seconds was at a desk, ‘signed-on’, and then just as casually strolled back out again.
This must have been around 2000-2001 so this isn’t any recent phenomenon, I’m sure it has been going on for years.
My final observation is that having worked in Sparkbrook in Birmingham for coming up to ten years, considering it is supposed to be one of the most deprived areas of the city with high levels of unemployment, most of the local Pakistanis seem to have very new cars, all BMWs, Mercedes and Audis etc, and it no longer shocks me to see Bentleys and Lamborghinis cruising around here.
You only have to read Follow the Money and deliberate destruction of britains economy by the eu. They will open your eyes
The problem with the welfare State was that it was a half-way house i.e. a socialist State ruled by capitalists where the private sector was entitled to the profits and the State was liable of people’s needs. It never dawned on the State to take the obvious to its logical conclusion and insist that employers who benefit from the country’s assets, services and human resources should pay the full cost of using these resources.
Instead the opposite happened. Multinational industries were subsidised placing workers and the poor totally dependent on the State. Employers, never slow to miss an opportunity, got more and more greedy, even going so far as telling people they should consider themselves lucky to have a job even if they had to work for nothing or at best work for less than State benefits. And in this the employers were aided beyond their wildest dreams by the Eu with its insistence on the race to the bottom with the free movement of people, goods and services. ………….
So! until those who benefit from State assets and human resources are made to pay for what they get ………………..
Could we sue.the manifesto ? Many others seem able to work the system.
The coming global fiscal meltdown transcends political parties; but decades of bad administration by mainstream parties will make our fate ten times worse. Yet voters always find a reason to support the mainstream and believe the MSM narrative, while joining in the smearing of parties like UKIP. When we’re all fighting over a loaf of bread and getting kicked about by EU gendarmerie jackboots or getting arrested for no reason, I expect people will still be pointing an accusing finger at UKIP and yelling ” Hard right. Tommy Robinson !” and wondering how things got so bad.
I just can’t understand however why UKIP has such a lousy website. Can’t anyone tell us why; It doesn’t explain issues, it doesn’t have useful links to Youtube playlists etc. Can someone give us an explanation now.
The UKIP is very hierarchic institution, top hierarchy does not like changes. I have seen a projects re websites attempted to work down to top – but it failed mostly due to lack of interest from UKIP’s management. Communication in the UKIP very poor and only top to bottom.
Well if that’s how it is: I can overlook many faults in UKIP but this is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE. Do whoever’s- responsible (the leader? the NEC?) actually want Brexit? In the upcoming leadership election we should be asking what each candidate proposes to do re the website.
It has always been like that, and it has annoyed me for years. Unfortunately many of the branch and regional UKIP websites are well out of date, showing names and phone numbers of people who are no longer in the official positions shown. Sometimes this is because the website has been set up by a volunteer member who doesn’t have the skills or the spare time to put into the job, or sometimes that person has left UKIP altogether and refuses to hand over the password, in which case the website can never be updated or taken down. Branches don’t normally have enough money to pay a professional to maintain a website.
This would be easy to fix if all branches’ and regions’ pages were part of the main UKIP’s page. This would allow local activists to worry about the content while technicalities, standard elements etc. could be managed centrally. And as always – lack of forum for members, supporters or even opponents where they could exchange and discuss ideas in the age of social media is putting me off. Speaking of the devil – check how relevant is content of https://www.instagram.com/ukipofficial/. And this is after the UKIP invited some Youtube mavericks who I suppose should have some social media skills.
Between 1991 and 2018 well over 6,000,000 non-Brits entered the country while near 2,000,000 Brits left it. In vast majority their cultures are different, birth rates are higher and unfortunately, a large part of them believes that it is their right to be here rather than a privilege. This process needs to be slow downed ideally stopped or reversed. Conservatives since their 2010 manifest stood every election with drastic immigration reduction but they lied and really were not interested in doing so. Without drastic measures changes, The Brexit Party seems a bit vogue on the issue, the UKIP policy is not addressing it well enough and the rest of the main parties will keep the status quo or will open gates even further.