The results are in. The BBC, stubborn to the last, is desperately spinning the results. Apparently if you add the LibDem votes to the Green votes, count Labour as a Remain party and chuck in all the minor parties’ votes (see what I did there?), the Brexit Party didn’t really win the EU elections. This was, if you look at it through the wrong end of the telescope while standing on one leg, facing the other way while wearing two eye patches and a blindfold, an obviously overwhelming victory for Remain.
It won’t wash. If the EU voting system were not fiddled to make it impossible to get a result that didn’t lead to compromise, fudge and horse-trading then there would be only one man standing after this apocalyptic night: revived by a couple of years off, invigorated by the mendacity of the political class and its betrayal of the British people, Nigel Farage once more bestrides the European landscape like a colossus.
When a new Pope processes through the cheering crowds of Rome for the first time, close behind him is a monk who, when the adulation reaches a hysterical climax, lights a flaxen thread soaked in pitch. It flashes into ash and is gone in an instant. Through the tumult the Pope hears the chilling whisper: ‘sic transit gloria mundi.’ So passes the glory of this world.
Let me be that monk, let me light that fragile thread, let me whisper the warning. ‘Watch it, mate, we’ve been here before and that went tits up. Don’t throw this chance away.’
It probably sounds better in Latin.
Let me digress. In the 2015 General Election UKIP came second in West Suffolk, which in 2017 meant that the final Radio Suffolk interview had me and Call Me Matt Hancock standing on Newmarket High Street being quizzed by the local presenter who was in a nice, quiet and warm studio in Ipswich. We’d just been wiped out in the County elections and he seized on this, rather rudely I thought:
“OK, you’ve won the referendum, you’ve been rejected by Suffolk’s voters. What’s the point of UKIP now?”
I’d learnt our manifesto, had it all down pat. But what came out of my mouth was unprepared, spontaneous, from the heart.
“Britain is ruled by a political class. Left or Right it doesn’t matter. They go to the same schools, the same universities. They party together, they marry each other. They’re the same and they no longer speak for the British people. The job of UKIP is to smash that political class.”
Nigel Farage has used the same rhetoric while on the stump for this election. Let me light the thread, let me whisper a warning.
The new MEPs deserve all the adulation they will receive from those of us sick of the troughers and parasites who infest the upper reaches of political life. New brooms, they can sweep away the Clarks, the Greens, the Kinnocks, the nomenclatura. But there is a danger here, the ‘meet the new boss, same as the old boss’ syndrome.
There’s an election coming, a real one, a General Election, one that could change the way we are governed. But it could still go wrong. The MSM knives are out already, picking over the names, hinting that far from smashing the political class, TBP is recruiting from it and is, after all the noise and fuss, just another bunch of entitled poshoes.
Counter that smear, crush it before it gains currency. Recruit from all walks of life, Dukes and dustmen, they have a right to be heard, a right to speak for Britain. Parliament should be like a jury, a cross-section of commonsensical real people who have their heads screwed on right and who know the value of things other than worldly success, money and power.
Up like a rocket, down like the stick. Not necessarily, Mr Farage. Get this one right, choose the right team and the Brexit Party rocket can make it into orbit.
~~~~~~~~
Julian Flood is a retired RAF pilot (Vulcans and Buccaneers) who recently resigned as Chairman of the West Suffolk Branch and left UKIP in order to vote TBP on Thursday.
Until today as the majority here and elsewhere I was convinced that TBP is at the moment a one trick pony. A look at their constitution and objectives are described as:
“The Party is a democratic, classical liberal Party and will espouse policies which:
•promote and encourage those who aspire to improve their personal situation and those who seek to be self-reliant, whilst providing protection for those genuinely in need;
•favour the ability of individuals to make decisions in respect of themselves;
•seek to diminish the role of the State;
•lower the burden of taxation on individuals and businesses;
•ensure proper control over the United Kingdom’s borders;
•promote and strengthen the rule of law;
•strengthen and guarantee the essential, traditional freedoms and liberties of all people in the United Kingdom.”
If this sound familiar this is almost an exact copy of UKIP’s objectives from the constitution.
There is no sign of #DirectDemocracy which Nigel was mentioning in a few interviews but from my first glance, it is all power into the hands of the leader.
Full text if you are interested here:
https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/254791/FOI-030-19-Response.pdf
Good advice Julian. I hope TBP won’t repeat the mistakes of the past and certainly the next step will be tricky. So far, TBP tactics have been spot on: KISS – Keep It Simple.- two objectives a) Win the mock europal elrctions convincingly – tick. b) make this a platform to assault the two party, musical chair system. In part a) what would be the point of a complicated manifesto instead of one clear objective = achieve Brexit.and change politics for good?
I am intrigued to know how Suthringa has iinside info on TBP s GE candidates.The only politico I detected in the Euros was Ann Widdecombe. Anunziata did once stand but wasn’t elected. The rest were achievers in all walks of life. Does Suthringa know the GE lot will be different?
I know TBP has been going only since April 12, launch, so it is a bit much to expect the full works just yet. But to say it is not a real party is just daft when it has just swept the board – 9 regions out of 10.
TBP is our best chance to break the rotten broken mould. If you want to do that, for God’s sake join us don’t carp on the sidelines.
The adulation for all those deserving Brexit Party MEPs: At what point are we supposed to stop the praise?
How about when they, one by one, quit the party when Farage forces changes of some sort they disagree with and can’t persuade him to relent? Retaining their precious troughers MEP salary naturally, rather than pass it down to the next on the party list.
You know – just like every single UKIP MEP last time round did, with the one glaring exception of one chap who wanted to retire from politics anyway.
Rob, I believe UKIP lost three seats, surely, all the others were not UKIP’s to lose.
Gerard has said, that it’s a unnecessary election with unnecessary opposition.
Julian,
It is impressive that you know the UKIP Manifesto – but as Brexit Party has just one policy not quite so at all. NF will not allow a coherent radical populist manifesto to develop for TBP because it will put off the Posh Tory leftoid-liberals he is courting as Candidates.
Which is why I wrote “Counter that smear, crush it before it gains currency. Recruit from all walks of life, Dukes and dustmen, they have a right to be heard, a right to speak for Britain. Parliament should be like a jury, a cross-section of commonsensical real people who have their heads screwed on right and who know the value of things other than worldly success, money and power.”
JF
JF,
This is no smear but good advice, watch “Nappy” farage as he goes into dictator mode.
Julian,
Farage did his own bit of totting-up this morning on GMB, ” if the leave TBP /UKIP
and CON’s were added together that would be more then all the remain votes”.
I think saying the CON’s are leavers is in question and remainer Labour could
now spoil all the sums.
Nice to see Nigel using UKIP when he needs to add up.
Indeed, if it had been FPTP, TBP would have swept up essentially all the seats. This is why the UKIP policy of wanting PR instead of FPTP is so idiotic. It is a loser’s policy. “Let me have one seat when I’m not doing well, so I, too, can have a lolly. I don’t care that it will stop me from ever having a majority, because even though I won’t admit that I’m a loser to you, inside myself, I know I’m a loser, so I’ll never come close to being a dominant party, and I won’t work for it, I just want my lolly NOW”. The UKIP policy makers couldn’t even get that one right.
Tomaz, FPTP is the very REASON we are stuck with the same two tired old parties in Westminster we cannot get rid of. A loser’s policy? When was the last time UKIP won just ONE seat in the Commons? Temporary Tory carpetbaggers, as I have banged on about ad nauseam previously, don’t count.
With PR, UKIP would have gained over 80 MPs in 2015, and 12 in 2017. This would have changed the whole makeup of the Commons when it came to battling Treason May and her demented remainer tactics.
I’m sorry Rob but i believe Tomaz is correct. FPTP is easy to understand and use and easy to administer. Its lack of probity is due to generations of bent politicians making small and seemingly harmless but helpful adjustments to the system for their particular benefit at thattime and slovenly not correcting it. A good example being the present claims by one or two MPs crafty suggestions, That they are not representatives but delegates. ( Wangling a new definition )
FPTP cleaned up is so far preferable it astonishes me that they were thoughtup centuries ago. Can we not have a paper from some constitutional lawyer to stop this irritating and wasteful nonsence now.
Incidentally, Farage is insightful, The discussion has moved on, leaving behind various half truths and incorrect beliefs.
A factor being (deliberately) overlooked in the EU election analysis is the fact that circa 3,5 million EU citizens living in the UK were entitled to vote, I would wager that the majority of those who voted would vote Lib Dem or Green hence the surge in the vote share for both.
However, come a General Election these voters would ineligbible to vote.
Labour must now get of the fence and which ever way they n p[move will mean the loss of votes from the Labour heartlands.
Don’t get carried away. Brexit Party is a single issue protest vote. Apart from that they’ll fall out.
Nigel Farage has confirmed this on the lunchtime news, the single issue, with the caveat that if we do not leave by October 31st his party will contest a general election.
But his party does not have the power to call a general election! The Tories won’t call one because they know they will be wiped out. Labour keep calling for a general election because they believe they have some god-given right to be in power.
Contesting an election is not the same as calling an election.
Loitering with a (seventeen and a half million person) loaded gun pointing at a corrupt Government can’t be a bad thing despite some looking at the Brexit Party with jaundiced eyes.
As to single issue:-
Cons – sell out deal; labour – a losers’ vote; libdums – surrender to the common market;
greens – who knows what goes on in their minds, likewise DontChangeUK Party.
Oh and the Wee Jimmy Crankie Party – me,me,me . . . another (Scottish) losers’ vote.
As to Deborah below, how about
”it was the Brexit Party what done it” Party.
Is Nigel Farage thinking of the name for his next party yet? pretty sure he will be resigning soon and off into the sunset when he sees a brighter horizon, that’s his MO!
Basically, you claimed representation at the European parliament, when no one in this country had any business doing so. Welll done. Better that Farage had lead a boycott – but then how would the likes of Heaver going to be kept in a manner grown accustomed to? And how else would the Government be able to demonstrate a false equivalence between Leave and Remain?
Absolutely right, almost of these new MEP’s (ex Tories) will be thinking about is their big fat pay cheques at the end of the month, that’s why I believe Ukip should have boycotted these elections and stood by their principles, but were the three remaining MEP’s just thinking about their big fat pay cheques as well?
UKIPs leaders have relied on their MEP salary, not drawn income from the party. Now UKIP has no sitting MEPs does UKIP have the money to pay for a leader? They have just unecessarily thrown away half a million quid on the Euro -elections and now presumably, the kitty is empty.
I think Deborah’s got it right, we should of boycotted these elections and voted for Nigel and saved our energy and money for a General Election with our brilliant Manifesto. It seems a lot of UKIPers have already joined Nigel anyway but we shall see. Robert D Mather