Today’s headline created by ‘staff’ for the daily compilation of print front pages is outstanding: “Newspaper headlines: England thrash China and asylum barge ‘death trap’” (link). Sorry if you thought this ‘trashing of China’ was about some English industrial or economical issue or about GCHQ detecting more Chinese spies. it’s about the world-shaking victory of the English female footie team beating the Chinese at the female footie World Cup. Now isn’t that something to make us all happy on this rainy day!

The outcry about the ‘barge’ relates to a report in the grauniad. Since yon barge was meant to be something of a swimming hotel, I wonder why it’s only a death trap for ‘poor refugees’ but not for paying customers. I also wonder what the ever so humanitarian ‘refugees welcome’ watchdogs really want: using big tents to house them is ‘inhumane’, the various Army barracks are beneath them, hotels must be at least 4 stars – I’ve yet to hear a proper proposal from those ‘poor refugee ‘advocates’ about where to put them.

Let’s move on and talk about the weather! If you thought that our ‘global boiling’ promoters in the MSM and other institutions would refrain from pushing this latest ‘climate alarm’, you’d be wrong. There was a nice report yesterday evening in the DM:

“So much for summer! Britain had on average more than 5.5 inches of rain as sunseekers endured the sixth wettest July since records began (and there are thunderstorms on the way tomorrow) – The start of August is also set to be a washout, the Met Office has predicted” (link)

Well, tough: this wet July is only weather. And so, to reinforce the ‘boiling globe’ theme, we’re offered an article in The Times, aimed at instructing us peasants that this is indeed a global ‘threat’: “Floods hit Beijing as wildfires rage across California” (link, paywalled). Why a tropical storm, bad as it clearly was, is not ‘weather’ but ‘climate change’ is something I’m too stupid to understand.

As for ‘wildfires raging in California’: don’t they ‘rage’ every year? Hasn’t it been shown, every year, that these fires are not due to a ‘boiling planet’ but to arson, exacerbated by green policies of mismanaging forests? Btw – has any of the climate terrorists ever recanted when subsequent investigations show clearly that those ‘wild fires’ were caused by arson, for example on Rhodes? Do let me know if you find such an excuse …

I suggest that more and more people living outside the charmed Westminster swamp realise that this Net Zero scheme is just another item in the arsenal of TPTB to control our lives. More and more people learn that those ‘in power’ demand that we peasants obey their ‘rules’ and never mind that those tinpot dictators couldn’t care less if subsequently our efforts are literally trashed. There’s a nice little report in the DT, headlined:

“Watch: Anger as bin men throw residents’ carefully separated recycling into one container – Canterbury council tells households they have to separate recycling but footage of its workers suggests that may not always pay off” (paywalled link)

Provided we diligently separate rubbish into different bags or bins – nice little earner for manufacturers of said bags and bins – and pay the fines for ‘mis-binning’ – another nice little earner, for local councils – it’s irrelevant if the nicely sorted and cleaned rubbish ends up on the same lorry or in the same landfill. It’s about control, not the environment. 

Meanwhile today’s harvest of ‘Silly Season News’ shows that the adults clearly have left the premises. For example, the DT has a whole report on Sunak’s trouser legs: “Menswear influencer critiques cut of the Prime Minister’s trousers and suggests ‘ill-fitting suits’ can be a political liability” (paywalled link). I wonder if “we” will have to ‘talk’ about this until the weekend. After all, the burning issue of Prince William not wearing kilts when in Scotland was kept running for three days … 

Next, we got a nice little tear-jerker about ‘teh poor’, this time about ‘poor kids’ and their school meals:

“Extra money for poorer pupils should be paid to schools and colleges until they are 18, say head teachers. They want the next government to extend the pupil premium throughout sixth form, from the present cut-off of 16.” (link, paywalled)

Yes, sure – why not! “We” have the money, don’t we! Moreover, kids can’t learn early enough that ‘The State’ will look after them while exerting control. ‘Free meals’ means kids must eat what is given them. Despite years of educating them and indeed their parents about ‘proper nutrition’ they still prefer normal junk food to ‘school meals’. 

Sometimes I wonder when those ‘outcrying’ lefties will notice that their virtue signalling is being perfectly exploited by big industrial interests, e.g. those who produce ‘ready-made’ school meals. And let’s please not worry about the packaging needed for such meals, packaging which will end up in landfills …

That’s all I have for today. It’s the Silly Season so why not be silly and gossip about Sunak’s trousers while worrying about floods in Peking and fires in California. Have a good day.