Fresh veggies are so expensive – that’s why we must Rejoin, ok?

 

Today is the Summer Solstice. You know this country is in dire straits when our proud MSM need to run articles under headlines such as ‘What is the Summer Solstice’. Today’s readers cannot be expected to know this, even though anyone can google it anyway, and never mind that this happens every year.

The latest news to which we all must pay attention is the fate of those people in the sub, stuck at the bottom of the Atlantic, garnished with the ‘mortgage’ crisis: “Newspaper headlines: ‘Praying for miracle’ and Tory split over mortgages” (link). I find it somewhat strange that this secular nation, on the verge of turning hard Left, is suddenly ‘praying ‘for a bunch of very rich ‘adventurers’, according to said proud MSM, but each to their own.

Meanwhile, there’s another ‘manifesto’ item presented by Labour which has been relegated to the ‘also ran’ spots in the online broadsheet editions, somewhere in their ‘Politics’ category. The Times reports that “Labour could tear up Brussels deal to forge closer economic links with Europe” (link, paywalled) and the DT writes (all emphases are mine):

Labour is willing to sign Britain up to following EU rules in return for a deal that would reduce post-Brexit checks on food, David Lammy has suggested. The shadow foreign secretary said  “negotiation involves trade-offs and discussions” when asked if he would bend to Brussels’ demands for the UK to mirror its standards. He also cited Switzerland’s deal with the bloc, under which the country copies and pastes the EU rulebook, as an example of an agreement Britain could strike.” (paywalled link)

Amazing, isn’t it, that the Rejoin Party is letting that particular cat out of the bag already! They must be very certain of getting into No 10 and must have concluded that the item about ‘food’ is a winner, given inflation and mortgage rises. They must also believe that, after seven years, Leave voters either have already died or are so resigned that there won’t be much resistance, notwithstanding the following:

“Mr Lammy’s remarks will enrage Brexiteers and add to their suspicions that Labour wants to return the UK to the bloc via the backdoor. During a speech at a conference in Birmingham, he reiterated that his party “will not rejoin the EU, the single market or customs union” in government.” (paywalled link)

I’m happy to mention again a warning from History. On 15th June 1961, as ever more people were fleeing from communist East Germany, the then reigning dictator told his people that ‘nobody has the intention of erecting a wall’. On 13th August 1961 that wall went up. That’s why I, for one, do not believe Lammy and Labour when they say they won’t rejoin.

There are more news on Labour’s plans to destroy our political system. The Times’ leading article at the time of writing has this headline: “Labour draws up plans to flood House of Lords with peers” (link, paywalled). Blimey! And here I thought that Starmer would finish Blair’s project of abolishing the HoL altogether … but nooo:

“Labour is drawing up plans to appoint dozens of peers to the House of Lords in order to ensure the agenda of a Sir Keir Starmer government is implemented.” (link, paywalled)

The unspeakable gerrymandering of the HoL aside, Cur Starmer seems to be on a ‘keep cake while eating it’ drive. He “pledged eventually to abolish the Lords”, but meanwhile needs ‘moar peers’ “to avoid a Labour government becoming mired in conflict with the upper chamber”, needing to “ennoble almost 100 Labour politicians” because 

“There are only 174 Labour peers, making up 22 per cent of the Lords, fewer even than the 183 unaligned crossbench peers. The Conservatives have 263 peers, meaning that they would remain the largest party in the upper chamber […]” (link, paywalled)

Turning the HoL, formerly independently scrutinising government legislation, into a political plaything: thank you for that, TBlair! I’m sure it’ll happen, not least because Labour has form. Look at this graph, showing how the selfsame TBlair inundated the HoL with ‘new’ peers. But these will be ‘peers of working age’, not geriatrics, so all will be well.

We also learn that the Nation is in peril because “British five-year-olds up to 7cm shorter than western peers” (link, paywalled). This article – duly copied by the DM (link) – is based on a report by the “Food Foundation”, a charity, which found that this diminution of our kids is due to “poor diet and health service cuts” (link, paywalled).

What a terrific argument for voting Labour: Rejoin so we can have better food to make our kids grow taller! And more money for the NHS, of course! After all, now that, according to this Foundation,‘food insecurity’ is ‘gripping 27% of families since January 2023’, “we” must put an end to ‘austeriteeee’ and ‘Tory Cuts’! Unlike the DM, The Times did quote a government spokesperson saying that government is :

“[…] providing record financial support to families who need it most — a £94 billion cost of living support package worth around £3,300 per household.” (link, paywalled)

I wonder if this timely report is also meant to garner support for the government scheme to tax sugar and salt. I wonder though how come that decades of preaching to us about ‘five-a-day’, of the James Olivers of this world promoting ‘healthy school meals’, have been with no avail.

Perhaps the aim is to control feckless parents, with more state control over their kids? Perhaps a Labour government ought to plan for proper food rationing, as during WWII, only this time with QR codes on smartphones. After all, rationing will surely become a necessity once we’re growing more ‘solar’ and ‘wind’ on our farms than food. 

That’s all I have for today. Here’s my final glum piece of news: from today onwards, the days are getting shorter. But you knew this already, unlike Generation Smartphone which needs to be told. Not that they’d notice, glued to their smartphones as they are. Have a good day.