Aaaand – they’re off. Again. Not the ‘candidates for PM’ but the columnists in the Westminster MSM. Some have discovered their heart for Sunak – for the good of the Tories, you understand. Others plump for the ‘Big Dog’. This morning’s print front pages are full of ‘BJ is coming back’ (link). The Sun graces the top spot in that compilation. It’s the best advert Starmer or indeed Sunak could have bought: Johnson looks so dissolute on that page that any normal person would try to keep him as far away from government as possible.

Meanwhile, the ‘candidates’ are garnering the support they need from their colleagues. Depending on the time of publication, Sunak has either 81 votes (FT, link, paywalled), 97 (DT, paywalled link) or 98 (The Times, link paywalled). Well, that shouldn’t be a surprise, given that Sunak was the MP’s preferred candidate this summer. 

And so to the ‘helpful’ advice the various Westminster editors feel entitled to give to the Tory MPs. There are some who believe that a Sunak-BJ combo would be the best thing for this country. The DM writes that “Senior Tories are trying to broker a face-to-face meeting between Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak in a bid to end the bloodletting engulfing the party” (link).

Strange – I thought that bloodletting is precisely what our MSM are most interested in, not the deep mistrust for BJ and desperation at the patent failure of La Truss. But don’t get up your hopes that this ‘deal’ might mean some Tory Big Beasts would try to persuade BJ to stand down in order to ‘heal the Party’ – oh no!

I note that all of this is only speculation, based on what some unnamed Tory ‘senior source’ has told the DM. Publishing this sort of thing is clearly meant to influence those MPs who still haven’t declared. After all, it’s important to ‘get on board’ because there will be posts to be had! The Times informs us that BJ is playing this game even though he’s still only coming back from his holidays, writing that BJ:

“[…] is prepared to offer a cabinet comeback to Rishi Sunak and Michael Gove if he wins the Tory leadership next week in an attempt to unite the party for a second term in office. Allies of the former prime minister said he was keen to reach out to Sunak, whose resignation led to his ousting from Downing Street, and potentially offer him the job of foreign secretary. He is also understood to want to make peace with Michael Gove, whom he sacked in his final hours in power, and bring him back into the cabinet.” (link, paywalled)

Apologies if reading this made you feel a bit nauseous. I myself felt slightly sick. Still, the DM is happily stirring the pot, documenting that it’s just a game for them and that they’d throw their weight behind a Starmer government when the time comes while insinuating that both Ms Braverman and Ms Badenoch are allegedly ‘moving back to Johnson’ (link). Amazing, isn’t it, how many ‘sources’ there are, leaking like sieves.

But don’t worry! Serious Westminster opinion makers know that in fact “we” must do as ‘Teh Markets’ demand – and they ‘trust Sunak’, as Andrew Neill in the DM writes:

“The Tories have a simple question to answer in the next few days: are they still a serious, grown-up party of government? Given its reckless, chaotic, cack-handed handling of the nation’s finances in recent weeks, it is by no means certain that it is. The only hope it has of convincing public opinion, at home and abroad, is by choosing Rishi Sunak as its next leader and hence our next prime minister. Any other choice would only confirm what many — from British voters to international investors — already suspect: the Tories are no longer fit to govern.” (link)

It escapes me why “we” must ‘convince public opinion abroad’. Moreover, does this mean ‘Teh Markets’ will be fine with an ‘adult’ Labour government? How interesting! Doesn’t this mean, in consequence, that said markets have recognised what we ignorant peasants have been saying all along, namely that LabCon are two cheeks of the same arse? In The Times, William Hague warns that selecting BJ yet again would leave the Tory Party in a death spiral (link, paywalled). I thought they were already at rock bottom, but what do I know … 

Meanwhile, Ms ‘P4P’ is still trying to garner support. She’s clearly not going to get any nice post in a Sunak government, nor in a BJ one. At least ‘P4P’ has promised to keep Hunt as Chancellor. Moreover, ‘research has found’ that, if the general public were to vote, they’d chose either Sunak or Mordaunt (paywalled link). Oh dear – is the ‘Big Dog’ no longer ‘popular’? Then there’s a certain Ms Tominey, weighing in with a lovely scare headline for her column in the DT:

 “Prepare for a revolt on the Conservative Right – On almost every issue, from immigration to free speech, the Right has been utterly neglected by the arrogant Tory mainstream” (paywalled link)

So she’s finally noticed that! It’s not as if she’s been defending said ‘conservative right’. And wasn’t she one of those most vituperative in the campaign to get rid of Cummings? Another columnist for the DT advocates for Sunak to support BJ because he could then become PM afterwards, being ‘only 42 years old now’ (paywalled link). Cloud-cuckoo land pure, innit!

‘Tis cloud-cuckoo land all the way down for BJ and his supporters. I’ve mentioned the Privileges committee yesterday already. Yesterday evening the DT reported:

“Boris Johnson will face Commons scrutiny on partygate up to three times a week from next month as the Privileges Committee investigating him picks up the pace of its inquiry. The seven-strong committee of MPs will begin to hear oral evidence from witnesses in their attempt to decide whether Mr Johnson misled Parliament. It could ultimately recommend that he is suspended from the House of Commons, which in turn could trigger a recall petition and by-election in his constituency of Uxbridge and South Ruislip.” (paywalled link)

This was happily picked up by The Times which went one better in their report this morning, headlined “No 10 staff ready to give party testimonies ‘against Boris Johnson’” (link, paywalled). Scrolling down a bit we read:

“The committee is likely to hold public sessions three times a week. Johnson will be called to give evidence, as well as being given the opportunity to respond to the testimony of other witnesses. One well-placed source said: “November will see maybe 40 hours of oral evidence. Partygate will be front and centre again.” (link, paywalled)

How utterly divorced from reality must all those Tory MPs be who are still supporting BJ! Is someone like JRM unaware that, no matter the outcome of those hearings, this means that a PM – if BJ ‘gets the vote’ – would have to spend hours testifying and preparing to testify instead of governing this country through the dire situation we’re in? Do the likes of JRM think that it won’t matter because all those nice mandarins will run the country for him anyway? Never mind though – yon Pres of the Ukraine is supporting BJ. He knows which side his bread is buttered, and it’s not ours, the paying plebs. 

Our fantastic Westminster MSM have prepared us nicely for a weekend of more bloodsport watching, devised by their columnists and commentators and fuelled by ‘senior sources’. Funny how these sources are always ‘senior’. Well, it fills their pages. I wonder if this is a mild variation of fear porn because surely we’ll be told next that we need to be afraid of whoever wins this backstabbing and horse-trading competition.

Have a lovely weekend anyway!