Thanks to covid more people have stopped trusting the government and its propaganda media than ever before. Johnson’s latest announcement about covid passports should and will be taken with a huge pinch of salt. We know we can’t bank on it. We know it’ll change when it suits the SAGEs. The Biden government for example has now ‘allowed’ industry to demand jab passports, so why wouldn’t Johnson also try to wash his hands in innocence, letting industry, hospitality, shops and superstores do his dirty work.
The one result we can already predict is that our society will become even more divided. This ugly split was already visible when it was about face muzzles. The division between jabbed and non-jabbed will be worse. Splitting society is a well-known, ancient instrument used by those in power to keep the plebs from banding together and, God forbid, topple them.
But that is for the coming weeks and months. There’s one other instrument of division which has been imposed on us. It’s the rise in NI contributions. Looking at our MSM this was just a storm in a teacup. It has vanished from their front pages, replaced by the ‘feel-good’ story of a British teenager winning the US Open – that’s tennis, you ignorant lot! – because what could possibly be better to entertain us and make us forget the harsh reality.
One piece of that reality landed on people’s doormats at the end of last week, announcing a rise in household energy costs. I don’t know if only my providers are trying to get me to install their ‘smart meter’ by promising a reduction in what they take off me, or if other providers across the country are also trying to do this. ‘Tis a proper carrot-stick coercion.
Now add Johnson’s threat, to keep WFH, mandatory masks and vaccine passports in reserve should hospital admissions rise (link). Incidentally, that’s not a lockdown, oh no it ain’t – but these measures will be deployed: since when in the 73 years of NHS have hospital admissions not risen in late autumn and winter?
Will the WFHers then demand a rise in salaries and stipends to make up for the higher energy bills? Pensioners will have to shell out because the state pension isn’t rising in step with those wage rise. The ‘triple lock’ has been broken because “we” cannot afford it. I’m sure we’ll hear cries of ‘unfair’ from the never-satisfied because pensioners receive that winter fuel allowance of £200.
And thus we come to the ‘never-satisfied’ who have been waging the ‘generational war’, who are trying to create a fundamental split in our society, ever since the 2011 Dilnot Report in 2011 – thank you, ‘call-me-Dave’, not! The rise in NI contributions is their latest weapon. There was a long ‘analysis’ in yesterday’s Sunday Times (link, paywalled) – a plug for the author’s book on ‘Generations’. The author, Professor Bobby Duffy, is director of the Policy Institute at Kings’s College London. Here’s the quote which sets the tone:
“It is a reality that recent generations of young people have had an incredibly tough time economically. There is absolutely no doubt that using national insurance as the means to raise the social care levy hits working-age people hardest. And yet younger people are not going to war with Granny. Why is this?” (link, paywalled)
Indeed – why? Do they perhaps see that their granny and gramps aren’t really swanning around on expensive cruises while they themselves work hard for ‘slave wages’? Perhaps they’ve seen the way gramps and gran have been treated in those care homes during the lockdown months? Perhaps some of them have even, sadly, inherited what remained of the alleged money bags granny and gramps were allegedly sitting on, described in the MSM to fuel intergenerational discontent?
The professor in The Times article is stoking those intergenerational fires by presenting some selected numbers:
“As analysis from the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows, only about 2 per cent of the new overall tax rise will come from pensioners, with about two thirds coming from families aged under 50. This is by design: pensioners get most of their income from private or state pensions, to which the new levy will not be applied.” (link, paywalled)
Funny how all who cry ‘it’s unfair’ never mention that the personal allowance of £12,570 applies to everybody, not just pensioners. But let’s disregard that – look at this calculation:
“As the Resolution Foundation points out, this means a typical 25-year-old will pay an extra £12,600 over their working life, while someone relying on pension income will pay nothing.” (link, paywalled)
Omigawd – £12,600 spread over a working life – you do the maths to see how huge that is! Don’t forget to keep in mind that this ‘typical 25-year-old’ might cheerfully blow that amount on a ‘proper wedding’, in one go. There’s also this:
“We do need to be careful not to caricature adult social care as only benefiting the old: only about 50 per cent of social-care spending in England goes on those above retirement age. But the point remains that just about none of the additional tax will be paid by them.” (link, paywalled)
So it’s not really about ‘young people’ having to pay for granny and gramps, is it? Oh, and all who are unemployed for one reason or another don’t pay NI either. No, the actual reason for the incessant howls of ‘in’t fair!’ is this: someone will not have to pay the taxes they do.
It is obvious to me that this ‘generational war’ is a favourite straw man, curated and pampered in lefty academic circles, Grauniad readers all, and is only about their beloved aim of redistributing wealth and income. It’s about fuelling greed and envy of the never satisfied who’ve been busily ‘fighting’ against ‘fat cat bosses’ – but not when it’s about the huge salaries the NHS bosses receive, not when it’s about the obscene ‘incomes’ footballers and ‘celebs’ receive, not when it’s about BBC ‘bosses’ getting eye-watering stipends, and above all not when it’s about the gold-plated pensions paid out for Whitehall Mandarins and indeed our beloved representatives.
Perhaps the ‘younger people’ who aren’t ‘waging war against granny’, to the astonishment of ‘progressive’ Common Purpose academics, know a thing or two about actual fairness. Perhaps this isn’t a ‘generation war’ so much but a war of those who have – for example the Westminster denizens – against those who pay for them: us peasants, old and young.
So remember: anything coming from that lot ain’t wot it sez on the tin. That applies to Johnson’s latest covid announcement as much as it applies to the ‘generational war’, stoked by those who aim to tell us how and what we must think. The ancient Romans knew this method already and used it. It’s called: divide and rule, dear boys and girls, ‘divide et impera’. See that you remember this for future use!
KBO!
Photo by jasonlumpkin 
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/work-together-gentlemen-and-save-our-country/
I posted this under Flyer’s article but it doesn’t hurt to get another airing. Heads need to be banged together.
Excellent but will they take notice?
I’ve paid a lot more tax and NIC than young people have or will do for many years to come. How’s that for generational disparity.
From the Jewish News Syndicate;
Caught on hot mic, Israeli health minister says ‘green pass’ not based on epidemiology
“Our problem is people who don’t get vaccinated. We need [to influence] them a bit; otherwise, we’ll never get out of this,” Nitzan Horowitz tells Interior Minister Ayelet Shaked.
https://www.jns.org/caught-on-hot-mic-israeli-health-minister-says-green-pass-not-based-on-epidemiology/
All energy providers are working hard to persuade you to install a Smart Meter because they are under an obligation to Government to install the required number in the designated timescale. I think failure incurs a penalty.
I have no intention of installing a Smart Meter. Their cause is not helped by the MkI being not fit for purpose because problems arose when changing energy supplier. The MkII does not have that problem. But what a waste – all those MkIs paid for by us and now not fit for purpose.
But there is a more compelling reason NOT to install a Smart Meter – the OFF SWITCH. The Smart Meter does far more than it says on the tin. The dedicated radio network that enables the energy supplier to read how much energy you have used also enables, among many other functions, the remote switching off of your energy supply.
And of even greater concern is that the radio network can be hacked and then manipulated to cause it widespread damage.
I noticed when I last changed suppliers that some tariffs are only available if you agree to have a smart meter installed. I think we can expect more pressure – they may become compulsory, once most people have them.
Bank on it, Xantilor! It’ll follow the tried and trusted lines of ‘everybody must wear a mask to protect me-me-me’, and the cry that all non-jabbed are ‘endangering the non-jabbed: “you must also get a smart meter because if you don’t it’s you who will cause brown-outs and black-outs” – oh sorry if I cause offence by using these words-of-colour … I’m fairly certain it’s still permitted but nowadays – who knows …
It’s interesting though Viv just how far back the push for smart meters started. It’s not just the present government seeking absolute control over us.
Yes Alan I am very, very, suspicious of these smart meters and aware of how TPTB are pressuring suppliers and consumers to get them installed.
If you can broadcast your warnings far and wide please do.
Apart from anything else their claim to save the consumer money is complete rubbish as it is common sense what uses most power.
The inter-generational warn is a phoney.. it is actually to get the youth to hate themselves so that they do not want to become a burden on their kids! The globalists only want productive people; therefore, it will be euthanasia for the millennials
Thank you for the analysis of the phony “generation war” propaganda. I too read the Sunday Times article in which, despite the headline, the author was forced to admit that both young people and the general population did not “buy” the story that baby-boomers had “creamed off” all the economic spoils for themselves. The first person to popularise this particular canard was David Willetts a former allegedly “Conservative ” Minister who was alleged to be “so brilliant” that he had “two brains”. In fact his work showed that he barely had a functioning single brain.
Another canard is that it is “unfair” that “working people” should pay for social care for “retired wealthy people”. This is an interesting one, since if you exclude “working people” who else is there who can pay higher tax? Is it proposed that children should pay (despite having no money)? Is it proposed that non-working people i.e. unemployed or non -working mothers, should pay? No, wait -they don’t have any money either. I know, let’s tax pensioners, they are all wealthy and they benefit from the social care tax: no, wait, they are the people we are trying to get out of a wealth imposition which may result in a loss of a home, or (even worse) the loss of an “inheritance” going to the younger generation, so it would neuter the whole purpose of the tax. Perhaps our “generation warriors” can explain this to me
Our present government is not fit for OUR purpose.
It may well be fit for IT’S OWN purpose.
“The ‘triple lock’ has been broken because “we” cannot afford it”.
But they can “afford” to squander 3.5 billion (BILLION) on an Army truck that’s not fit for purpose. Not to mention all the Covid
s£$t.
Indeed mary. Where are the charging points for that Army truck?
I don’t begrudge the army 3.5.billion. It’s the stupidity of what it has been spent on.
…or £100 billion and rising fast for HS2!!!
Jonathan Pie sums up the Fat Boy and his supplicant MPs. Yes, even Redwood, Davis, McVey, Baker etc, They are all partners of the same firm.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2111620275653473&extid=NS-UNK-UNK-UNK-UNK_GK0T-GK1C&ref=sharing
Raising money is hard, saving it is easier.
The last estimate I saw for HS2 was £120,000,000,000. A billion is a small number, putting it into numerals makes clear how big it really is. Cancel it at once.
Overseas Aid should be limited to £4,000,000,000 per year and reserved for emergency use. If not needed in any year it should go into the general taxation pot. There will be those who say this is not enough. Very well, publish the bank details of The UK Voluntary Aid Donation Scheme. This fund should publish a ten point hitlist of aid requirements for each year, donors voting for the top three.
Cancel all EPR reactors except Hinckley C
Order SMRs instead – not only cheaper it would save our Grid and means we would not be letting the French learning at our expense. And the money would stay in the UK.
Retrospectively tax wind and solar farms, Gordon Brown showed that that is legal.
I leave savings of another £100,000,000,000 to the readers’ ingenuity.
JF
So far as John Redwood is concerned Jake – todays diary asks many questions about what NHS money is spent on.
I was tempted to comment, in fact I’ve just decided I will. ‘Very good questions Sir John. Will you get any answers?’
HS2 should have been scrapped of course. It might have shown Boris to be a real brexiteer!
‘Will you resign over the matter Mr Redwood?’
However we can apparently afford to pay our useless MP’s a pay rise substantially above the rate of inflation every year for the foreseeable future cant we? There always seems sufficient money in the kitty for that purpose. They all make me sick to the stomach. We need mass clear-out of existing MP’s in the House of Commons and reduce the number of those time wasters from the current 650 to something like 300 members and the total abolition of the House of Lords, but we have been saying this for years now and nothing happens……..
The House of Lords worked very well, and was often more in tune with public opinion than the Commons, until Tony Blair ‘reformed’ it.
I absolutely agree. I think many of them regarded it as service to the country, a duty. Thanks to Blair it became full-on cronyism.
we could begin by not voting for anyone standing under a party label, and encourage all the neighbours to do likewise. Imperfect solution, maybe, but it would be a start.
The reports of the death of covid passports are greatly exaggerated. (Apologies to Mark Twain).It
It seems that all of these people you see in the media warning us of their Covid suffering were all actors.
See this very short video.
“Covid Crisis Actors”
https://rumble.com/vmfbhe-covis-crisis-actors.html
Sorry flyer this tin just doesn’t open for me, no matter how many clicks I give it .
Have I been rumbled?
Roger. It worked for me and the evidence is convincing.
As children we may have been threatened (by Nanny) with the Bogeyman under the bed who will get you if you if you don’t do as you are told.
As we got a bit older/wiser/more rebellious/more courageous we peeped under the bed… and what did we find?
NANNY.
NANNY (who,of course, knows best) is now far more dangerous than the virus from which she claims to be protecting us.
Funny video, flyer, made me chortle. (Not very good actors, and Ramona was particularly irritating. I expect they were glad to get the work.)
It never occurred to me that they were anything other than actors.
The subtle or not so subtle propaganda is everywhere. A Yorkshire local paper ran a story about a young woman killed by the jab; they put words into her father’s mouth that he never said. They made out that he said he still advised people to get the jab,
Fake news is everywhere. Try these:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E38zbgV3dGCG/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LHHHrGdQBBDa/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ssMm25decxLK/
There is also a picture I have mislaid, of a poor little girl apparently being ‘saved’, carried away in the aftermath of bombings in Lebanon, on three separate occasions, each time by a different man, but she is wearing the same dress and has the same war-torn casualty make-up in each shot. You couldn’t make it up; but unfortunately they do.