Watching – so you don’t have to …

 

The only frontpage this morning with an exciting headline is the good old Star, bless them. I love how they nearly always manage to step out of the usual propaganda line, served today by ‘staff’ under: “Newspaper headlines: NHS pay deal and ‘Banks try to reassure investors” (link). Scroll down all the way to the bottom – I won’t give the game away!

As for the rest of the propaganda mouthpieces … well, apparently the nurses are now content with a lump sum and a rise of 5% on top of the 4% proposed last year. Isn’t that a bit of a climb-down, having demanded a cool 19% when they started their strikes last year? Never mind – it’s junior doctors now. Apparently, while they strike, consultants are doing their work.

We’ve not heard anything about how much the 100,000 civil serpents got, after their strike on the 1st of February. You didn’t notice that? No, me neither. We’ve also not heard if or if not the rail strikes have been resolved, and for how much.

It seems to me that one unintended consequence of the lockdowns is that we peasants have become more resilient, that we’ve learned to keep going anyway. The trade unions expected an uproar from us, in support of their strikes. It didn’t happen. Surely our esteemed MSM would have reported even the tiniest public support.

Labour, we remember, was remarkably reticent, even unto removing some of their figures from a prominent job because they joined picket lines, against the order of Starmer. Moreover, as we all know: if it’s not in the BBC and The Times, it didn’t happen …

Speaking of Labour and the BBC, early this morning the DT’s online front page had a fantastic combination of headlines, right on the top of the page. Next to “Labour threatens pension tax raid that ‘will hit millions’” there was “BBC licence fee could rise by £13 next year with the Government under pressure to intervene” – how tone-deaf! Funnily enough, for some reason neither news item has made it onto the print frontpage of the grauniad …

Lets have a quick look at the Labour Plan first because this is also in The Times. Their chief editors gave this plan a lovely spin: “Dash to retire before Labour reverses pensions lifetime allowance plan – Concerns that Jeremy Hunt’s move in spring budget could produce ‘gold rush’” (link, paywalled). How callous: thinking only of themselves! This is Labours’ argument:

“Labour described the policy as a “bung to the 1 per cent”. It said Hunt’s pension reforms, which are expected to cost more than £75,000 for every person they encourage back to work, were a “gilded giveaway” and pledged to reintroduce the lifetime allowance if it won the election.” (link, paywalled)

Let’s add the utterance of the tiny section of the Uniparty, or let’s call it the ‘Uni-Opposition’, the lovely LibDems. Yes, they’re still around:

“Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister, said the changes could lead to a “gold rush” as workers accelerated pension savings, then cashed in by retiring early before the election if they thought Labour would win.” (link, paywalled)

Omigawd! How dare the wage slaves try and better themselves, especially when it’s about securing their old age! How dare they not obey their masters and go back to work, to generate more taxable income for the Treasury! The DT reports:

“Jeremy Hunt’s back-to-work drive is under threat as Labour prepares for a tax raid on up to two million pension pots. Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, announced that the party would reverse Mr Hunt’s decision to scrap the cap on the amount people are allowed to put into their pensions before being taxed. But analysis showed that in two years’ time – by which point Labour could have won a general election – two million people could face paying taxes of up to 55 per cent on their pots as a result of Ms Reeves’ policy.” (paywalled link)

According to the DT, this announcementhas thrown financial markets into chaos‘, with savers inundating pension providers about how to protect their pension savings. But don’t worry: Labour is looking after their own, following the old rule that some animals are more equal:

“She [Ms Reeves, Labour Shadow Chancellor] promised, however, that Labour would introduce a separate scheme allowing doctors to pay into pension pots tax-free, amid fears that hundreds of NHS consultants are considering early retirement.” (paywalled link)

Interesting, isn’t it: Labour will protect ‘fat pensions cats’ like senior consultants, in order to ‘save’ these employees of the largest employer in the UK. Does anyone think such separate scheme wouldn’t also surreptitiously be applied to other NHS ‘fat pensions cats’ in e.g. admin? If so, you clearly haven’t got the message than none are more equal than those working for the Sacred Cow. 

And so to the other sacred cow, the BBC. The telly tax is projected to rise by 8.2% next year, paying for all those glamorous figures like a certain crisp merchant, or certain ‘general directors’. Tory MPs demand government to stop this. I wonder if Labour will support the BBC – or the poor old paying peasants. Difficult, innit! Still, I don’t expect them to support actual BBC employees, workers in the music industry – of classical music, that is:

“The abolition of the BBC Singers is putting Britain’s peerless choral tradition at risk, the corporation was warned yesterday as musicians considered a boycott of this year’s Proms. The BBC’s decision to disband the country’s only professional chamber choir and make sweeping cuts to its orchestras has prompted an angry response from across the music industry.” (link, paywalled)

Will Labour tell us that “we” don’t need no Proms, singers and musicians because classical music is ‘only for the posh fat cats’? Will they demand  to ‘save the Proms and raise the licence fee’? Or will they demand to raise the licence fee while also sacking all those musicians? What a difficult decision …

That’s all I have for today. We’ll see if the ‘Reeves’ schemes’ will become a Labour own goal, scuppering the expected election victory. As for me – I’m channelling my inner Rhett Butler, again. Have a Joyful St Patrick’s Day!