“Nothing is certain except death and taxes”

 

 

There’s now a crisis according to our dear MSM which tell us in their print editions today that the ‘cost-of-living’ has risen to 9%, or perhaps 10% or even 11% (link). The DT blames Putin, while the Express and Mirror have suddenly discovered their hearts for poor pensioners – these are baby boomers, but it’s expedient for now not to mention this. We also learn that ‘the No 10 Team’ is blocking that windfall tax on energy suppliers. It’s all terribly gloomy, and somehow so very unexpected, even for the highly-paid ‘experts’ writing in the MSM. Well, they had other things to bloviate about, since the 24th of February.

Let’s take a closer look. There’s the Mirror summarising a report from the Institute of Fiscal Studies and the culprit is Sunak:

“Soaring inflation is ­causing untold misery for Britain’s poorest families as they struggle to survive. The 3.1 million ­worst-off households are being battered by cost of living prices going up faster than anyone else’s. It means that while inflation has hit a 40-year high of 9% overall, for the poorest it has actually gone up by 10.9%. But for the richest 10% of households it is 7.9%, according to research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Rishi Sunak is still refusing to help ease the cost of living crisis by resisting demands for a windfall tax on energy giants.” (link)

It is not earth-shattering news that those on lower incomes spend more of their money on food. That’s well known and documented. It’s also not earth-shattering that the Mirror, the Labour Red Top, moans that ‘the rich’, who were able to buy more expensive food items, can level down and buy the cheaper stuff whereas the poor can now only go to food banks.

It is however indicative of the economic illiteracy of the Mirror writers to insinuate that this windfall tax ‘will ease the cost of living’, without saying how that might work. It is a lovely cudgel to bash the Tories with, and The Times has jumped on the bandwagon because it’s just such a juicy item, helping to undermine Johnson while whitewashing Sunak. They don’t seem to notice that they are being utilised by Treasury mandarins who would of course love to collect even more taxes:

No 10 is resisting pressure for a windfall tax on energy companies on the grounds that it would be “ideologically unconservative”. Treasury officials believe that the levy is “politically unavoidable” but are being blocked by the prime minister’s advisers. […] In conversations with No 10, Treasury officials have argued that while a windfall tax would not raise a significant amount it would send a powerful message to the public that the government was “on their side”.” (link, paywalled)

Strewth! So raising a tax which in the end we, the consumers, would have to pay through ever higher prices is ok because ‘it sends a powerful message’ and never mind rising inflation? Is this what plain economics has come down to: political messaging for the plebs? There’s more:

“Boris Johnson’s advisers are said to be resisting the move because it would be viewed as an attack on business. One of them said it would be an “ideologically unconservative thing to do”, The Times has been told. Sunak is increasingly in favour of a windfall tax because of the failure of energy companies to commit themselves to investing to shore up supplies.” (link, paywalled)

Oh, bad Tories, innit, with their conservative ideology of not attacking business …! Sunak’s reasoning looks amazingly amateur, insinuating that this tax is punitive because the bad energy companies haven’t done enough to ‘shore up supplies’. Please let’s keep world markets out of this, don’t mention ‘sanctions’, and don’t point a finger at Net Zero policies which aim to wean us off gas and coal.

Above all, let’s not ask why No 10 and the Treasury haven’t ‘nudged’ those energy companies into ‘shoring up supplies’ a year ago when this crisis started to develop. There was also that negligible little thing called ‘covid’ with money being printed as if there was no tomorrow, to alleviate the economic pain of lockdowns.

It doesn’t need to be mentioned that the Treasury loves taxing anything that moves. The next tax is already being ‘consulted’ about. It’s an ‘online sales tax’. The BBC has a report this morning where we read that the government has been ‘in consultations’ on this issue:

“The Treasury has been sounding out the retail industry on an online sales tax since February saying it is keen to hear the arguments for and against, as well as how it could work. It said no decision has been made.” (link)

I cannot recall having seen articles in the MSM about that consultation. So I checked out the government site and lookit here what I found: that announcement was made on Friday the 25th February 2022 (link). What an excellent example of hiding ‘news’! We do remember, do we not, what happened on the 24th of February. Clearly, the reason we plebs have been left in the dark is Putin’s fault.

A brief check using the browser of your choice shows that trade groups and grocery supermarket chains were well aware of this consultation. The consensus seems to be that such a tax would be useful if business rates on shops were reduced – as if any proper Treasury mandarin would ever support lowering a tax, any tax.

I expect the rift between us peasants and the Westminster swamp dwellers to widen increasingly as the weeks roll by towards the Autumn budget. Inflation, more taxes, even higher energy costs: no matter because our ‘government economists’ and the MSM editors are as economically illiterate as they’re scientifically illiterate. There’s a great comment article by Allister Heath in the DT today which deserves our ‘FROM BEHIND THE PAYWALL’ treatment – here is the link.

I leave you with the earth-shattering news that a female (what else!) DT ‘war correspondent’, reporting from the Ukraine, fell in love with a little dog and brought her home (paywalled link)  – aahhh! See – we don’t need to worry about taxes and inflation and war when the DT has space for such a heart-warming story!