(Continued from Part 1, published here yesterday)
“Having discarded the false hope of renewables, what can give us the energy we need, the energy to power our factories, warm our homes, grow our food while being cautious about the demon carbon? In the long term it must be nuclear. I have this week awarded a contract to a Rolls Royce-led consortium to develop three small modular reactors of 440 megawatt power. These will be factory built, then assembled on sites previously assigned to the impossibly expensive and almost impossible to build European reactors. Once the designs are optimised we will order SMRs in batches of twelve, with half of them earmarked for export to nations which are energy poor. Much of Sub-Saharan Africa will qualify for this aid which instead of vanishing into corrupt bank accounts will actually improve the lot of the poorest in those nations.
I have cancelled all work on EPR reactors in the United Kingdom. They are poorly designed and they are not needed.
A responsible administration, and mine is a responsible administration, must be prepared for all contingencies. While no-one can trust the pseudoscientific crystal balls which have so panicked the world (and climate science is, Madame Chair, if you will excuse the expression, a load of crystal balls <leers at camera>) we must proceed with caution. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. New technology needs time to settle down, and even though our nuclear-powered submarines have operated for decades with no problems we must allow for delays in civilianising the technology. We need reliable cheap energy now, not in ten years. Fortunately the answer lies beneath our feet – there are trillions of cubic metres of natural gas in the Scottish Midland shale, literally down there <points down>, trillions more in the Bowland Shale in Lancashire, trillions more in the rest of the UK.
There has been opposition to fracking for gas, some from locals but mainly from outsiders, from the ideological crusties who wish to keep us in fuel poverty. I cannot address the concerns of the latter, any more than I can persuade them to have a bath, but as to the former I have today mandated compensation for those affected by fracking. Any damage caused by earth tremors – we do not expect any but we wish to reassure worried residents – will be compensated at three times the cost of repair. Furthermore, all houses within five miles of a fracking site will receive ten years’ supply of gas for space heating, cooking etc or an equivalent cash payment.
We then move on to another climate concern, one that really exists: pollution of the air of our cities, pollution in the lungs of Her Majesty’s subjects. A rolling programme to convert HGVs and buses, diesel trains etc to compressed natural gas fuel will begin on the 1st of January next year. This will cut CO2 emissions from those sources by half, while reducing NOX and particulate pollution almost to zero. The lithium mining children of Africa will thank us for not going the electric route until our SMRs come on stream and better battery technology is developed. From 2025 all new diesel vehicles in the UK will use the Adblue system. And while on the subject of cars, we will, within a year, ban the use of food-derived alcohol in petrol and diesel. Burning food is immoral.
As a bridge fuel, natural gas is a natural. It is clean, low carbon and good for our balance of payments. There are those who would leave this resource in the ground, but then, Madame Chair, there are those who would send us back to the stone age in pursuit of their demented dreams. Not on my watch, Madame Chair, and not on the watch of any administration I command.
Finally, we will address the failures of climate “science” <sketches quotation marks in the air>. I have established a think tank peopled by outsiders from the climate debate, people with different ideas about why the world is warming and whether that is a matter for concern. For too long those with an agenda have acted as gatekeepers to publication in this subject. No longer.
There is our roadmap to the future. The UK will travel that road alone if necessary, but we will welcome any companions who understand that low carbon, high energy, low cost, win, win and win again is our destination. I urge the world to follow us into a brighter future.
Madame Chair, you will excuse me if I stop there and if I decline to attend the rest of this talking shop. Like all its predecessors it will fail to come to any useful conclusion and some of us have a country to run.
<shuffles papers, grins at the cameras, waves and goes back to work, leaving the boondogglers to rant and weep.>
~~~ *** ~~~
It was CO2 that GREENED planet earth. I.e. it enables plants to photosynthesise, thus producing oxygen for animal life to breathe.
Gretta’s education must be as bad as ours in Britain.
Germany has chosen. Germany has chosen wrongly.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/08/28/germany-chancellor-calls-for-europe-wide-carbon-pricing-on-transport-and-industry/
Nuclear is certainly an option, but we have the constant problem of waste handling. – Nothing like enough time has been taken to investigate the power possibilities of tides, with its constant movement that is possible to predict !
Two problems I know of from experience Mike. First The foreshore is owned by the Queen. This adds a layer of bureaucracy.Altho not seriously. The other, unbelievably serious, is the opportunity for all who own a bit of anything anywhere with a hint of usefulness or inconvenience instantly sees the the chance of unbelievable riches, and realises that Government or Public Institution or Monster businesses can and will pay huge muliples. in competition with the existing framework of Electricity Boards cash cow ( Tax )
So the enemy is corrupt greed. and parliamentary institutionalised delay.
Hey Julian.
What’s the plan for nuclear waste disposal?
Existing and future.
Oh, you don’t have one, just stash it away for future generations to sort out?
I notice you want the fracking to occur up North. Any reason for that?
There’s oil and gas under Kent you know. It’ll need fracking to extract it. We need to share the muck and bullets out a bit more
https://www.kentonline.co.uk/weald/news/kent-fracking-sites-17665/
There is a fracked borehole that runs from Wych Farm and under Sandbanks, the most expensive real estate in the UK. Dorset, I think.
JF
Harry I tend to favour coal as I believe it will work out cheaper in most situations and that is the only reason. In situations where SMRs prove cost effective that would be the way to go. I especially like the idea of keeping this British industry going and I hope it works out. Congratulations would be in order if it does. However, on the other hand, it is important to keep electricity costs competitive with China and not to be bamboozled into more expensive power because of their highly effective, widespread propaganda.
Oh yes, with regards to ‘what’s the plan for nuclear waste disposal’ this is a really easy problem to solve. Initially It isn’t disposed of it’s stored. Eventually when it’s radioactivity has declined enough it can be permanently disposed off or perhaps repurposed and used in molten salt reactors if these become viable. Either way it is a cost of doing business which needs to be factored in when choosing between nuclear and coal.
Engineers don’t avoid problems where there’s something that needs doing. They solve them.
Oh and in case you’re worried, I think someone would have stopped Communist China from accelerating the rate of increase in the amount of carbon dioxide they release into the air every year by now if it really was dangerous.
I don’t understand all the technical stuff but it sounds to me that Julian Flood does. I’ll vote for his program.
As to fracking, surely the USA have tested it out pretty thoroughly.
BJ canceling a project here was an early example of him being a dithering wimp. It was causing far less disruption than his precious HS2.
(From your imagined speech by Boris Johnson) “people with different ideas about why the world is warming”…. So Julian you accept the endless drivel about global warming. But it is far from certain that global warming is a reality. Before that long hot summer of 1976 made them a laughing stock Friends of the Earth kept predicting global cooling and a new Ice Age.
After that summer FoE and the rest of the ecomaniacs did a sharp about turn and started drowning out the airwaves with predictions of a lethal Global Warming that will end all human life on Earth by the end of the next century. But even when their climate scientists torture the data until it confesses they can still only get a temperature rise of less than one degree Centigrade since 1976.
The whole purpose of this pseudo-scientific Green drivel from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is to justify the establishment of a world government through the United Nations, as planned in UN Agenda 21/30 /50. And they seem to be getting away with it.
“(From your imagined speech by Boris Johnson) “people with different ideas about why the world is warming”…. So Julian you accept the endless drivel about global warming.”
I believe this failure in logic is known as a non sequitur. Boris is imagined to say ‘why the world is warming’ and hence I must believe in global warming. Sat what? Let me help you out here. In spite of the corrupt science and hence the impossibility to quantify the reality, my hunch is that we are still coming out of the Little Ice Age and as such the warming is natural. However, i can run you up a theory of AGM which explains the (slight!) warming signal, the isotopic C signature and the failure of he Grand Banks cod fishery. Whatever it is, if it exists then it’s still no cause to panic.
JF
… Say…
Oh THANK YOU Ralph Protheroe! I remember that Summer 1976. Wow. I could stand the heat in those days. Helped a farmer get his hay in.
What I’m thanking you for is, that I did not realise Friends of the Earth, et al, were wringing their hands about the approaching Ice Age.
Tragic though isn’t it that so many people apparently fall for the Green Drivel and I’m sure you are right it is to justify U.N. World Government.
Well that was breath of fresh, reasonable but decisive and sensible air. Were it only to pass the lips of our PM.
Excellent article. I especially liked your approach re fracking. In Johannesburg when young I lived with the frequent rumbles from the gold mines below. People would laugh and say that’s the sound of money being made. Some were enough to make the plates in the kitchen rattle. I think we need to get cracking with fracking and as a first priority get Drax back on coal. We need to maintain and refurbish our existing coal generating plant and then expand our energy production based on economics. Nuclear should include the cost of commercial insurance against catastrophic failure for a fair comparison.
Gretta and her communist fan club should tour China telling them to tear down their coal plants. I’m sure the good comrades there would welcome her warmly. After all, don’t THEY want to save the planet?
I agree with Julian`s plans for SMRs (Small Modular Reactors) and I believe Rolls Royce have been working on prototypes for some time.
Has he any advice as to when these will come on stream..
I have noted RRs latest poor results due to the Chinese Disease and their need for more capital and to be quite honest I think their jet engine production problems will continue for many years in that air travel will be slow to recover (is that journey really necessary – business men and possibly the holiday industry)
In the present circumstances I think RR would welcome substantial SMR national and Global coverage.
(Is a substantial increase in fuel readily available? – and disposal of spent? are alternative fuels under consideration?)
I like the mention of Deserts could they be used in “greening” deserts?
RR are working with Reaction Engines – if Sabre works the world – travel, defence, asteroid defence – will change.
JF
There is talk of waste consuming reactors. I would guess that if money was spent the problem would be ameliorated. Does anyone have _ expert_info?
JF
Most enjoyable article. If only! Who does Johnson and most of his MPs fear the most – the green lobby, Greta, UN, globalists and countless NGOs, academia, charities and foundations or the sceptics?
Probably not the voters . . .
JF for PM??
Dear Boris ,
Are you sure about Fracking ? ‘Cause it doesn’t sound like it. Neither am I. The money poured into lobbying on its behalf etc would seem to prove that it is as crooked as a paper clip..
I am bit of sceptic too. Gas is dirt cheap on the international market and will possibly be so for years to come.
How much does fracking ‘pour into lobbying’? I mean, how much compared to green lobbying? One tenth? One hundredth? Less?
JF
Well yes JF , but I have a sneaky kind of agreement with the greens if you ignore the fact they’re communists and that that is geared in somehow.
And it is targetted and concentrated.