~~~ *** ~~~
(Graph created by the author)
I’ve been a Brexiteer for many years now, voting UKIP back in the days when the Conservatives seemed completely unable to offer any hope for leaving the European Union then taking the next step by becoming a UKIP activist shortly after the heady days of the 2014 European Elections; trudging the pavements of Newark, leafleting and spending a day ‘Telling’ during that By-Election, on behalf of Roger Helmer.
Following that, running the Rutland & Melton UKIP Parliamentary Campaign in 2015 on behalf of our candidate, Richard Billington, a good year for UKIP both here, where we quadrupled our vote-share and across the country where the Party pulled in nearly four million votes for the first time ever. I’ve worked as an Election Agent and have stood as a UKIP Councillor Candidate and having left that Party in 2017, following the shambolic Leadership saga and the farcical Stoke By-Election, became a Brexit Party Supporter and a Candidate applicant for the European Elections this year.
And now, this month, I have joined the Conservative Party…
Why? Many factors. For me, personally, the positivity of Johnsonian Conservativism strikes a chord after the years of Theresa May misery – the true ‘purgatory’ in recent memory. The fact that despite all the naysayers, Boris has actually come back with a deal, a deal that is better than Theresa May’s and, most importantly, a deal that has won the support of Jacob Rees-Mogg, the European Research Group, the ‘Spartans’ and others. At the same time, having spent my life in business, I’m only too aware that, very often, the first deal struck is not the best possible for either party. But, it’s a starting point.
Facts and circumstances shift as time moves on and that starting point can be built on to improve the deal yet further. The alternative to supporting Boris’s deal is to stay stuck in a continual cycle of depression and extension, endlessly damaging British business and watching the Referendum result that Brexiteers like myself worked so hard to achieve, being gradually whittled away, until we end up Remaining in the EU by default.
And that last point is why it is so important that the Brexit Party and the Conservatives reach an accommodation when it comes to the General Election in December – in exactly the same way that Remainers are doing on the other side of the argument. Even if this means that big egos, on both sides, have to be swallowed for the sake of the greater good.
Even a quick look at the Election statistics from 2017 (and acknowledging the fact that there have been some changes since) shows that the Conservatives have over 250 seats where their majority was greater than 10% in 2017. These are seats where the Brexit Party should not stand a candidate at all, because it’s a waste of their activists’ time and Party resources but mostly because it can only split the Leave vote, possibly letting a Remain candidate in, in seats with the lower percentile margins, which is the last thing either Party wants. This figure includes, by the way, the current Speaker’s seat, Buckingham, where John Bercow enjoyed a comfortable 48.83% majority in 2017. The same should also be said for the sixty-seven Conservative seats won with less than a 10% margin especially with respect to over forty where Leave won the day during the Referendum.
However, there are over fifty Labour seats where, in 2017, Labour won with a margin of less than 10% and of these, nearly forty voted to Leave in the Referendum. These include seats in the so-called ‘Labour Northern Heartlands’ such as Blackpool South and Workington which the Conservatives might have less chance of taking due to traditional ‘tribal loyalties’ although, in the light of what has taken place over the last three years, loyalties which must now be sorely tested! These are the seats where the Brexit Party should focus its resources, which after all are somewhat more limited than the Conservative Election machine and conversely, seats which the Conservatives, under Boris Johnson, should give the Brexit Party a clear run at.
Sensible compromise at this stage could well result in the country returning a strong, pro-Brexit Government with a large majority, guaranteed support from the first Brexit Party MPs to enter the Commons (quite possibly a larger ‘bloc’ than the DUP one) and the potential to negotiate decisively with the EU thus setting aside all the scare-mongering about the ‘Transition Period being indefinitely extended’ etc etc.
Unless both Party Leaders reach some sort of accord then there is a very real danger that Leave vote-splitting could result in another hung Parliament, a Lib-Lab pact, the revocation of Article 50 and the UK remaining trapped within the EU after three and a half years of the Referendum result being explicitly denied by Parliamentarians, despite the British people voting, by a clear and decisive majority to Leave. The damage to democracy will be irrevocable.
Brexiteers, like myself, will not thank Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson if their unwillingness to compromise results in the ultimate irony: Britain remaining in the EU by default.

Independence Daily (nee UKIP Daily) make its true position more evident with every one of these articles.
No longer is it committed to supporting UKIP and the aims of a clean break from the shackles of the EUSSR, which 17.4 million people voted for m but it advocating the views of formerly disaffected Conservative party supporters who are now returning to their original home, and pushing acceptance of a BRINO which will put up a customs barrier between Great Britain and Northern Ireland./
Its sad that you have forgotten Northern Ireland with the deal Boris has acheived. Thats why it hasn’t got DUP support and we do not want a border down the Irish sea. Just equal treatment as British citizens and let no Conservative candidate forget the Union and how important it is to fellow citizens in Northern Ireland. Please DO NOT betray us here !!
Raymond,
The Tories have never given a fig about NI, the DUP, or anyone else for that matter. NI is electorally unimportant to them.
This deal will annex NI to the EU with the Tories consent. The error the DUP made was not looking at their history books.
Tories have screwed NI many times, Churchill (offered NI to De Valera in exchange for entering into WW2 on British side), Heath (Sunningdale), Thatcher (Anglo Irish Agreement) and now Johnson with his EU Treaty.
How any British citizen could betray their own citizens so blatantly is beyond me. A man who would do this to NI is dangerous, and would have no qualms about ditching the Falklands, Gibraltar or and other British territory at a whim.
Rest assured Raymond, there are plenty of people on the mainland (like myself) who see right through Johnson’s deal, and we will do all we can to stop this EU surrender treaty.
John Locke
Gerry Robinson’s article is particularly interesting. Sir John Redwood has just said to me – I support a FTa. That was when I said an article 50 Agreement (particularly May’s reheated ‘deal’) was NOT brexit. We want to leave on WTO terms. I’d written wanting alliance with Farage and Richard Braine. But Sir John’s answer seems promising. Maybe Boris’ deal really is an opening shot and the best we can hope for.
Although Gerry wants Brexit Tory alliance it looks like we are going to get Tory manifesto pushing Boris deal and dropping ‘no deal’
You have misunderstood John Redwood’s position. He proposes that we leave under WTO terms attenuated by Article 24 of GATT whilst negotiating a genuine free trade agreement with the EU. He may be trying to avoid rocking the Tory boat during the election campaign.
It is important to understand that under the treaty which Gerry Robinson is trying to flog on behalf of the Tory Party, we will be controlled by the EU until we have negotiated a trade agreement acceptable to them. That trade agreement will resemble the Customs Union and include the four freedoms, the continuing theft of our fish, and alignment with the EU on farming and manufacturing. There is no other possible outcome.
There is no common position between a British government which actually wants to respect the Referendum result and the Brussels regime. That is why there should never have been a negotiated ‘leave’ treaty.
As I have said in another comment on these pages………….in short……….Firstly, every UKIP voter should give their vote to The Brexit Party.
Secondly, this will assist in the election of Leaver MOP’s. Thirdly, once we infiltrate The Brexit Party (which after all was essentially built by UKIP hard work and voters), infiltrate that Party and bring it to heel by filling every conceivable area of power with a UKIP sympathiser.
From that point we would work tirelesssly to introduce the UKIP Manifesto which is a noble and ‘British People First’ Manifesto.
Sure, I like Nigel………and I suggest that we utilise his Machiavellian techniques for OURVIWN ends…….after all historical he has profited from our UKIP supprt and votes to establish his position in politics. “A rose by anybother name would smell as sweet”. If you can’t beat ’em, join em, and then control them from within………….sounds rather Islamic, don’t you think?
I like the way you are thinking, thank you.
I’m sorry but I cannot understand your naivety in joining the Conservative Party.
Positivity? There are a few exceptions to the current rule which is that MPs are all scum, and that does not include the PM. If he is such a strong leader – with a backbone – why did he pull the HoL filibuster on the Benn Surrender Act? Failing that, why didn’t he advise HM not to grant Royal Assent?
Why is No 10 apparently completely ignorant of Britain being a signatory to the 1969 Vienna Convention, which defines the Benn Act as having no legal effect?
And lastly – and I’m sure there’s a dozen other questions – why did this ignoramous not plead ‘No Contest’ at the Robin Tilbrook appeal?
Why? Because Boris Johnson is a REMAINER! How much more proof do people need for gosh’s sakes?
Never trust a Tory. They will cheat. They will lie. They will make sure that, at the end of the day, whatever happens, whatever is said – that Britain remains in the EU.
The Prime directive of the Tory Party is the survival of the Tory Party. Nothing more. Nothing less. Nothing ELSE.
And the ultimate pathetic irony to all this is, that if he did man up to any of the above actions, the last thing he would have to worry about is re-election.
Thanks Rob, you summarised all of it so succinctly. I will copy and paste far and wide if you don’t mind.
By all means JB, the more understand these things the better.
It seems hard to believe, Mr Robinson, that you were once a UKIP activist and yet you have recently decided to join the Conservatives because of “Johnsonian Conservatism”. I can only assume you believed Johnson’s assurances that we would be leaving the EU on 31st October “deal or no deal”.
He is now blaming the breaking of this promise on the Remainers in Parliament but he had ways of avoiding the Benn Act becoming law (such as filibustering in the House of Lords) but he rejected those and went on to meekly accept the extension granted by the EU.
You may have written this article before Johnson had turned down the offer Farage made yesterday of a Leave Alliance but, at least, you will now know that it is your new party who will be responsible if we end up remaining in the EU – an outcome that would probably suit the Conservatives down to the ground.
The remain parliament voted for it bu a majority of 30 .
Who needs small print to know it is NOT leave if the traitors and turncoats vote for it ?
I’ll definitely NOT be voting Conservative, as Boris’ deal is terrible & I don’t trust the Tories to even deliver that. Unless there’s a Brexit Party presence in parliament, large enough to push through a clean break Brexit, we’ll end up tied to the EU for ever.
Unless your MP is a supporter of a clean break Brexit, then the Brexit Party is the ONLY choice worth taking & that’s before even considering the root & branch changes needed to the UK political system.
“Time to put party politics to one side . . .” unless you are a Tory, obviously.
Although I personally would rather enter into a deal with the devil than the treasonous Tory Party, Farage, at this point, is clearly the bigger man having already offered Johnson a deal. If the author wants to blame someone in the event of the Leave vote being split then blame the Tories not the Brexit Party.
“And now, this month, I have joined the Conservative Party…”
I guess you are opting for EU servitude then. I can assure you I won’t.
There are only three meals on this GE menu:
1. EU associate membership
2. Remain
3. Leave
Conservative: EU Associate membership
Labour: Remain/EU Associate membership
Liberals: Remain
SNP: Remain
Green: Remain
DUP: Leave
TBP: Leave
The Tories have no intention of compromise, they are trusting the unreliable polls once again. Besides, after witnessing their treatment of NI, the DUP, Veterans, fishermen, lying about NI businesses trading to the mainland, unable to make our own trade deals, EU defence union…..I could go on but you get my point.
When the live TV debates come the truth will come out.
‘No essential loss of sovereignty.’ Ted Heath
‘Not this time sunshine.’ John Locke
“The damage to democracy will be irrevocable” and if we don’t do as you suggest “we’ll remain trapped in the EU.”
The “Withdrawal Agreement” Treaty would effectively suspend democracy and leave us entirely at the EU’s mercy. Do you think the EU would let us go anytime soon, especially when they want our money and do not want a competitive UK on its doorstep ?
Watch this then ask yourself if we’d be worse off with this dreadful vassalage treaty than with the previous status quo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHt8GpGTORo
Europhilia is in the Tory DNA and I’m surprised anyone continues to fall for their lies or come back to them for further humiliation.
Saved me a detailed comment Mary; thanks.
You cannot seriously hold the Remain Alliance up as an example for leavers. The remain alliance is basically hard remain. There is no soft remain or ‘a little bit out’ remain.
Those arguing for a leave alliance to get May’s surrender deal are asking brexit supporters to support a compromise version of leave so soft to so gentle you wont notice the difference. Shame on the ERG.
With Boris we wont leave full stop. I have huge problems understanding anyone supporting the conservative plans for Brexit. There are no benefits to a soft deal with an exit date projected 2,3 or 5 ,10 years down the line. But like tomorrow never arriving. The deal is really the first steps back into full membership and reversing the referendum result.
I also remember the newark bye election. It was Boris super fan Robert Jenrick (with the silver spoon education and corporate EU lawyer wife) who won that seat and will probbers win again next month. Best mates with Nick Boles. Drain the swamp before you swim.
Matt up North : You say “a compromise version of leave so soft to so gentle you wont notice the difference”. If that were so, we would have nothing much to lose by giving it a try. But think we WILL notice the difference : for the WORSE !
https://independencedaily.co.uk/the-junta-that-is-waiting-to-rule-over-britain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHt8GpGTORo
I will never forget the film footage of Eurocrats killing themselves laughing because they are on the point of making a colony of Britain.
Fair comment Mary. Maybe i wasn’t clear. By soft compromise brexit i had in mind the existing unsatisfactory state of affairs. The future for Europeans looks very bleak inside the EU police state and we should waste no time leaving. I want to notice the difference an independent government makes when we leave the EU and the laws and decisions of that government put our country and its people first. That would be a difference we would notice!
Hi Matt up North . Me again ! “The future for Europeans looks very bleak inside the EU police state and we should waste no time leaving”.
May’s proposed security treaty also needs scrutiny here: it has gone under the radar as it is cunningly not part of the Brexit negotiations. Continuing with the EU Arrest Warrant (rather than an extradition arrangement observing due process) will mean conforming to the arbitrary “justice” of the developing EU totalitarian legal system. But Govt is hell bent on sticking with this, and refuse to worry (sarcasm alert) about anything as trivial as the trashing of our common law legal rights. Torquil Dick Erikson has written about this topic.
“a deal that is better than Theresa May’s.”
Well marginally, but it’s still indefinite vassalage. I am surprised that with your declared background you have not seen the small print, and even more surprised that if you have, you can re-join the Conservatives. They, including the Torygraph, have all closed ranks to pretend it is Brexit to save the party, and they have you, along with so many others it seems, fooled.
The very fact that the deeply remain MSM have published so little analysis and not piled in and rubbished Boris’s claims should be evidence enough. Boris has merely, and I am sorry to be indelicate but there is no other way of putting it, polished May’s turd.
https://mailchi.mp/thebrexitparty.org/if-you-only-read-one-thing-about-boris-johnsons-deal-make-it-this?e=f8ab35abad
“Brexiteers, like myself, will not thank Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson if their unwillingness to compromise results in the ultimate irony: Britain remaining in the EU by default.”
You must know that Farage has openly, and long called for, a compromise. He did it again, eloquently, at TBP campaign launch yesterday (and you would do well also to view Anne Widdecombe’s short contribution about lying and the rottenness of this parliament.) It is Boris and the Vote Leavers (who still arrogantly believe they did it all by themselves and want no one, least of all Farage, getting any credit at all or gaining a foothold in ‘their’ domain) who will not compromise. They and only they will be the ones ‘not thanked’, as you put it.
Against all my gut feelings, I really wanted to believe in Boris. But it is said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results. Party before country is in the Tory DNA, and however many times you hope differently they dash your hopes.
Thank you Phil O’Sophical for eloquently saying everything I think and also to do what Julian Flood advocates on the letters section. We won’t be fooled again.
I actually think BoJo’s international treaty is worse than the Maybot surrender, in as much as it puts the whole of the UK union in jeopardy. NI will have to import most of its exports to The rest of the UK under border export forms. Technically, NI will be considered part of the EU Customs Union with a border down the Irish sea, which fulfils Merkel’s dictum, ” Britain can leave the EU but it must leave NI behind”. This, in turn, will be used by Scot Nats to demand Indyref 2 on the grounds of fairness. So 95% Maybot surrender plus NI and the Union in jeopardy. Well done Boris and at least one contributor to this column has fallen for it. God save Britannia.
2/11/2019
I foresee a problem. Trade deals between countries are actually treaties. And unless a treaty has an escape clause so that the next parliament is not bound it becomes final and can only be fixed by war. Hence Gibraltar is British not Spanish.
I’ve not heard anyone trying to sell the Boris (reheated May) deal (treaty) on the basis that it’s not binding on the next parliament so I presume it is.
One effect of this deal (treaty) is that President Trump will not be able to offer the UK a US trade deal (treaty).
https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nigel-farage/world-exclusive-interview-with-president-trump/
Could you please explain to me why there is any mention of ECJ in many clauses. What the reason is for transition based new bodies. Every so called barrier is of EU making, including nearly all tarrifs. I think ( Not emote ) Ferociously defended inventioned like ECHR, Data protection, IP etc etc that are not even new, just appropriated.
No. I’m afraid you have been recaptured .
After 3 years ,your party has indead demonstrated, at best, the success of the parachuting of candidates.
Why do you finish your otherwise good article saying
“Brexiteers, like myself, will not thank Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson if their unwillingness to compromise results in the ultimate irony: Britain remaining in the EU by default?”
Nigel has several times appealed to Boris to do just what you ask, but alas, Boris and the Conservatives have refused. So, in that light it will be Boris and the Conservatives who will be solely to blame if it all goes wrong.