We publish this image courtesy of John Hart
I watched yesterday’s proceedings in the HoC. It was a sad spectacle – sad not just because the Remainers won ‘that’ amendment – Amendment A, see the list of amendments here – but because it demonstrated to the Nation how, for the sake of Remain, our elected representatives thrashed our Referendum vote, our constitution, our democracy.
Yesterday (here) we described that Ms May’s proposal for the Statutory Instrument to extend Article 50 was unconstitutional. It was obvious to me, having followed the debate in the HoC for as long as I could stand it, that, with a very few honourable exceptions, none of the MPs were even aware of this issue.
Worse was that their ‘performance’ again was not about the May ‘deal’ or amendments but about ‘my constituency’ and about ‘Project Fear’. I write ‘performance’ advisedly because this was not a debate.
Even worse was the spectacle of the Chamber emptying immediately after Ms May had spoken and left. Brexit and how to achieve it, surely a vital issue for this Nation, was unimportant. They had made up their minds already, they didn’t need to hear the few objections to that ‘Letwin Amendment’. The whole thing was a total waste of time.
Next, let’s look at what our beloved MSM made of it. First of all, to add to the confusion, it’s about the ‘Tory Rebels’. If you assume that this means the ERG because, after all, they’ve been described as hardcore rebels for weeks now, then you’d be wrong. ‘Tory Rebels’ are now the ones who voted against the May government by voting for that Lewin Amendment. Here’s a non-paywalled report.
It was and is striking that the MSM totally disregarded the contributions by Tory and DUP MPs which came in the first half hour or so after Ms May had presented her ‘plan’. So here are the links to the most important ones – do watch them:
- Sir Bill Cash – whose pointed question has now sunk below the MSM horizon. Ms May could not answer his question at all but simply faffed around.
- Nigel Dodds DUP – watch Ms May smirk – but: proper answer she gave none.
- Owen Paterson – just the text. As far as his Remain colleagues were concerned, he might as well have talked to the wall. His comment went in one ear and out the other, never mind the monetary implications for our country.
- Crispin Blunt – who was both blunt and crisp. Ms May’s answer shows her at her ineffectual ‘best’: her BRINO way or No Brexit.
- Finally, the journalist Andrew Lilico tweeted this scathing resume.
I wonder if it occurs to the Remain Tories and to Ms May and her BRINO cabinet that being congratulated by the enemy, Mr Corbyn, for this Brexit-wrecking vote means they did wrong (paywalled, here). Probably not: in the face of averting Brexit, there are no enemies except Brexiteers …
Given the enmity towards the proper Brexiteers, the ‘hardcore ERG’ and the DUP, who. in the eyes of the Remain MSM are alone to be blamed (as opposed to Ms May, Whitehall and the rest of them) here are some remarkable bits of information in The Times (paywalled):
“Relations between Mrs May and the DUP, on whom she relies for her Commons majority, deteriorated yesterday as the party reacted angrily to suggestions that the collapse of Stormont could be to blame for a delay to Brexit. […] Nigel Dodds, the DUP Westminster leader, accused the prime minister of inventing a reason for delay and criticised what he said was a “fundamental” lack of preparation for leaving the EU without an agreement with Brussels. Sammy Wilson, the DUP’s Brexit spokesman, also accused Mrs May of using the Irish border as an excuse for failing to achieve Brexit. […] Mrs May also risked inflaming tensions further by warning that the government would have to reimpose direct rule in Northern Ireland from Westminster in a no-deal Brexit.”
That, in my humble opinion, was a huge error by Ms May – but she doesn’t seem to care about the DUP any longer.
Next, our ‘Project Fear’-addicted MSM have now homed in on a possible GE, see e.g. here. This is no idle speculation when you read this report on John McDonnell ‘demanding’ that Treasury staff be retrained in left wing ‘economic theories’. As if that were necessary!
While the Cabinet has shown itself incapable of preparing for Brexit or of standing up to Ms May’s WA, they did find the time to ‘wargame’ a possible GE, as The Times (paywalled) reports:
“Cabinet ministers yesterday “wargamed” how they might call a general election to break the Brexit deadlock. In an emergency meeting ministers debated whether they would have any choice other than to call an election if the UK were forced into a long Brexit delay or a softer Brexit. […] “It’s not just scaremongering, it’s the only way out of this,” said a source.”
And there you have it: rather face a GE than concede that the No Deal Brexit is the only solution! The following is also instructive, showing how far the Cabinet debate is ranging:
“The cabinet even discussed the circumstances under which Jeremy Corbyn could become prime minister even without an election. Under the provisions of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, the government losing a vote of confidence in the Commons does not necessarily lead to an election. Instead there is a two-week period in which others can attempt to form a government that commands a majority of the Commons.” (same paywalled link)
And then there’s this:
“The party political calculations played out despite some ministers’ concerns that civil servants were ensuring that official minutes recorded partisan debate to insulate themselves from blame in a future inquiry into Brexit.” (same paywalled link)
Well, if Whitehall civil servants are already trying to find cover for their backsides, then electoral armageddon is definitely on the cards: the endgame for May’s government has begun.
This is where we stand on the ‘day after’: Remain in the HoC, the Cabinet, Whitehall and 10 Downing Street have achieved their aim: ‘no deal’, no Brexit, tinkering around the edges of the WA while posturing like demented peacocks, and Corbyn in the offing.
17.4 million votes? Forget it. Parliament ‘taking control’? Control of what?
Unless the ERG and DUP step up to the plate and bring this government down, this is it.
Unless there’s a judicial injunction in the form of a Gina Miller Mk II, this is it: the grand Brexit stitch-up.
Since the MPs, Ms May, the government have trampled democracy under their EU-provided jackboots, might we now see civic unrest? And would that help? The first truckers of that slow-go protest on Friday have already had their collars felt by Plod. Knife-crimes they cannot deal with – but protests: oh yes they can.
In old-time reckoning, it would have been 3 days to Brexit.
In new, EU-time reckoning, it’s 16 days to Brexit – if it ever happens.
We must KBO!
“No force on earth can stop an idea whose time has come” We will prevail.
I believe EU law takes precedence over UK law since we sold our sovereignty for EU membership years ago. Time we got it back but it’s looking increasingly doubtful with the Great Remainer Parliament in control.
THE CROWN DEFFINATELY DOES NOT WANT TO TAKE ACTION! I trust it is not ‘forced’ into this mess, but effectively Parliament is in utter ruins ! A fact has to be accepted by everyone.- Government / Parliament has broken down for the first time in three centuries, and Mrs May has indeed been assured her place in our history, though not as she would wish !
Not that the EU will agree, but Brexit must be put on hold, to the extent of no further action or payment or anything with Brussels until root and branch adjustments are made. I can only see the Crown as having the right to appoint a Commission to deal with this, since CONSTITUTIONALLY it is HRH’s Government and Parliament.
Part of the break down rests with individual MPs. They have to be, if necessary forced to accept, that they are elected by voters and are our Representatives and Public Servants. Only upon war directly upon this Nation, can an MP deviate from their Party’s manifesto terms, and Parliamentary Rules will be sacrosanct ! Any breach to result in dismissal !
A thorough rethink is required upon the system of election. FPTP will be abandoned. A system of National PR will be brought in, but much thought must be given as to which PR system is adopted ! In all of this, time will be needed, and therefore our relationship with the EU has to be total disconnect, and upon WTO trade terms. Future EU connect is not ruled out, but that to be a future item for a Party to consider !
My opinion is that if we let this Parliamentary mess, try to sort itself out, then we may as well move to wholesale emigration from this country. Yes, I’m sad that it has come to this, but I’m very angry that MPs, who are certainly well rewarded, have literally brought the house down, and manifestly need to be schooled upon their duties !
The EU is reluctantly preparing for a no-deal exit and, on some TV channels government advice is being offered as to what to do when – if – we do leave. All this being kept pretty low key. But there has obviously been some planning which they don’t really want us to know about.
I’d make a contribution to an injunction fund.
Seagull management is a management style wherein a manager only interacts with employees when they deem a problem has arisen. The perception is that such a management style involves hasty decisions about things of which they have little understanding, resulting in a messy situation with which others must deal. The term became popular through a joke in Ken Blanchard’s 1985 book Leadership and the One Minute Manager: “Seagull managers fly in, make a lot of noise, dump on everyone, then fly out.”
“As seagull managers only interact with employees when there is a problem, they rarely offer praise or encourage when things are going well. When problems arise, they often seek to place the blame on other people, and to draw attention to themselves in order to appear important. They criticise others, but make little contribution to the solution of a problem.”
“The seagull style of management may be indicative of a manager who is untrained, inexperienced or newly-appointed.”
Mrs May is a seagull manager being fed scraps by the EU that she dutifully dumps on her electors, constituents, Party members, Parliament and the whole of the British People.
Parliament are behaving like other noisy, messy, irritating seagulls eager to feed off the remaining scraps to keep their possession of power via their endless clucking and squawking, violent mobbing, clubbing together and mock in-fighting before flying off to their constituents to dump all over them too – while claiming to “represent”.
Was it Letwin who last night said, we are politicians not the ordinary electorate?
After their pointless vote got through last night they were like over excited, unruly, children in the sweetie shop. Shouting and braying at each other at length. The pressure coming out of the cooker. They think they have won. What a disgusting spectacle.
Exactly my thoughts, too.
And mine. It was appalling – and in the Mother of Parliaments, too. They have no shame.
You do do an excellent example of the old fashioned art of Precis. . You and Debbie much appreciated.
🙂
Corbyn will usher in ‘The end of jobs as we know them ‘. Here comes the block and chain economy !, closely followed by the ball and chain then immediately by just thechain.
So, three days until the original Brexit date and that date still stands in British law, they’re cutting it a bit fine if the government hope to change it, things could be about to get interesting.
Three days to Brexit and we’re in this mess, what the hell do we pay these useless politicians for? Parliament these days is like a chimpanzees tea party, the only difference is that the chimpanzees would very probably make a better job of Brexit.
I thought the PM had already made a unilateral decision that we weren’t Brexiting on Friday, riding roughshod over British law.
Our law says the 29th March. International law says 12th of April, I’m not quite sure how they’ll work that one out.
I don’t suppose the EU will allow any insignificant British law to trump their over-arching almighty law.
We need a Cromwell. At least we’ll have a proper dictatorship, not a dictatorship by stealth which we now have.
If ‘that B****y woman’ is allowed to get away with making a unilateral decision without getting it approved by both Houses of Parliament beforehand; and it looks as if parliamentarians are totally oblivious to what she has done, what is to stop her pulling the same stunt over her benighted Withdrawal Agreement?
What is to stop her pulling the same stunt? Not a lot, I fear.