Watching on our behalf: TPTB had better not disappoint him …

 

 

I never knew our MSM were so … royalist! All the front pages have one theme only: yesterday’s state funeral of the Queen (link). And why not! You cannot proclaim an event as a solemn, ‘only once in generations’ on the one hand and then not report on it extensively. A bit further down I shall add a few personal observations on yesterday’s State Funeral. 

Firstly though, in tune with the ‘now we must get back to business’ claims,  there’s an opinion piece in today’s Times which made my day! It’s a piece written by the historian Anthony Seldon. You might like to peruse his biography in his bland wiki entry (link), a list of his books included. These books show that he must have had years of access to rather good “sources”.

When I saw the title of his opinion piece:Scapegoating and purges won’t improve the civil service” (link, paywalled), my antennae for detecting bovine excrement started to twitch. Reading on, I was not disappointed. The 2nd paragraph started with the sentence “Top of the agenda for His Majesty’s government must be the demoralised civil service Liz Truss inherits.” – oh my giddy aunt!

Demoralised, is it? I don’t think Mr Seldon or his sources know what it really feels like to be demoralised! After all, civil serpents are so secure in their jobs that they can WFH without repercussions. It gets better – or worse, depending on one’s attitude to the civil service:

“Yet never before have we witnessed so much systematic hostility and open disparagement of the civil service, with so little improvement. Talk of a “shit list” of top officials is novel. The two best prime ministers since 1945, Clement Attlee and Margaret Thatcher, would never have dreamt of sanctioning such language, and both knew their historic changes rested on brilliant officials.” (link, paywalled)

No, they would indeed not have sanctioned such language – but that is due to their upbringing and to the times they lived in. “Shit lists” and other choice derogatory labels have grown on the MSM midden that is ‘popular culture’, the ‘yoof culture’ of the Blair generation because it was ‘so edgy’. There’s more:

“The civil service today is losing some of its best, failing to recruit the best and transparently is no longer the best. Suspending fast-stream recruitment was dim. “Under Dominic Cummings then Jacob Rees-Mogg, the civil service had never seen more energy put into criticism and negative briefings without as much as a clear reform plan for improvement,” says Alex Thomas of the Institute for Government. Institutional enhancement isn’t achieved by scapegoating nor purging the top levels.” (link, paywalled)

Oh, the poor, misunderstood mandarins! Criticism, such as that by the arch-fiends Cummings and that other fiend Rees-Mogg, who believes civil servants ought to be seen to work, trying to take away that wonderful WFH scheme.: that cannot be permitted.  Criticising the civil service in any shape or form, be it in crude language or the more dangerous soft one employed by JRM, is abhorrent!

The next paragraph however takes the proverbial. It’s a ‘proposal’ for how said civil  service should be reformed. Declaring that such reform isn’t rocket science, Mr Seldon proposes:

“Reward and retain the ablest: recruit more specialists, not least data/digital experts; define better what officials, ministers and special advisers do; avoid pointless churn, which sacrifices institutional memory and expertise. Restore cabinet government and committees toco-ordinate government policy properly.” (link, paywalled)

That is precisely what Cummings tried to implement. Does Mr Seldon, do the mandarins with whom he spoke, now embrace that which they so vehemently rejected two years ago? Was Cummings actually correct? How horrible!

The concluding paragraphs document the resilience of Whitehall where mandarins are past masters at pulling wool over government ministers’ and MSM writers’ eyes. It’s what they excel at. They don’t even notice any longer that we know that they live on a different planet:

“The civil service has achieved much in the past few years, from Brexit implementation and vaccine rollout to the Queen’s funeral. Yet top officials are reluctant to speak up for it or raise concerns. Don’t speak truth to power is the lesson they have absorbed, but divergent opinions lie at the very heart of good government.” (link, paywalled)

This one phrase, “speak truth to power”, uncovers the left-leaning (I’m generous here …) attitude of both Mr Seldon and the mandarins to whom he undoubtedly spoke. As for the rest: ridiculous! As if we peasants have already forgotten how Whitehall tried their utmost to sabotage Brexit, from setting up the referendum unto collaborating with Brussels to make it go away!

How farcical this gentle appeal is, i.e. to be nice to the demoralised civil service, becomes clear in the final sentence of the concluding paragraph:

“Truss’s reduction of the size of the bloated No 10, and her determination that cabinet government be reborn, are encouraging starts. But without a well-motivated and professional civil service (and history shows repeatedly it loyally follows clear and consistent political leadership) her plans will never be achieved.” (link, paywalled)

Good grief – a ‘loyal’ Whitehall? Do note the sting in the tail: mandarins ‘follow clear and consistent political leadership’ … If they don’t, it’s the fault of yon leadership. We know what this looks like, for example the experience of Ms Patel which was HO internecine warfare. The fate of us, the taxpayers, were irrelevant.

I leave you with a few impressions, engaging my mind while watching the proceedings. For example, I immediately recognised one of the roses in that magnificent wreath. The deep purple roses is called ‘Munstead Woods’, and I have one of those in my garden.

Then there was the horrible moment when one of those splendid soldiers – dunno what his rank was – saluted when the Queen’s coffin was taken out of Westminster Abbey. The palm of his pristine white gloves was dirty!

I felt for the poor ratings who had to walk those miles, especially after the service, pulling the gun carriage. Walking on board a RN vessel is, shall we say, restricted. They can never have walked for so long in their lives.

And finally, at Windsor Castle – the corgis. Allegedly, they were sad when seeing the cortege. Well, lemme tell you: they looked dead bored to me, and even before the hearse passed, one of them turned away and tried to get back indoors as quickly as possible. Dogs, even royal corgis, are not interested in rituals, be they ever so grand and important. 

The final act in the reign of the Queen, the State Funeral, is over. The organisers, the Armed Forces, did the Queen proud – and so did we, the people. Nobody can ‘do’ this like our Nation can and did. Now it’s time for reflection. As for me: I’m collecting material to mock the mockers who will inevitably come out from under their tables, to have another go at us. I look forward to that!