Back in the headlines …

 

Our MSM are salivating: there’s ‘class war’ to be had! The working stiffs who still buy their daily paper for their commute are presented with these choices this morning: “Newspaper headlines: Private schools ‘go to battle’ and HS2 salaries” (link). 

Grim as it is, better prepare for a constant drip-drip-drip of the policies of envy, splashed out in the Westminster MSM up to the day of next year’s GE. The aim is so very transparent: get Labour in. And so, while one lot of news editors moans about Ms Braverman daring to say that multi-culti doesn’t work, the other lot goes on about unfairness and ‘teh rich’.

The readership of The Times’ must either be card-carrying Labourites or they are being groomed to get Starmer in by inducing a guilty conscience for daring to be ‘well off’ and ‘posh’. Public schools have been a particular bugbear of the Left and now they believe they can finally destroy even this part of British culture:

“Labour will introduce VAT on private school fees immediately if it wins power, meaning parents could face higher costs shortly after an election. The charitable status of private schools will be abolished in the first months of a Sir Keir Starmer government, the party has signalled. VAT at the 20 per cent rate would be added to fees in the first academic year after an election, rather than being phased in.” (link, paywalled)

This cash grab is necessary, according to Labour’s chairwoman Ms Dodds, because they want to improve the state sector’:

“We want to make sure that every child can attend an excellent school,” she said. “We need to be gathering the money from somewhere in order to be able to deliver that change; we’ve been really up front about this.” (link, paywalled)

Indeed they have – but don’t expect those top Labourites and their helpers in the Westminster MSM to look at the ‘success’ of state education in all those schools in towns and cities where Labour has run local councils, sometimes for decades. Schools are run by local councils, not “The State”.

I suggest that the uproar about crumbling school buildings has only abated because some editors found this out. They’re of course not going to point their fingers: that would anger Labour. Who needs education anyway when someone like Ms Rayner can become deputy leader, and when there are NGOs who determine which latest trans stuff is going to be taught to our children. 

Funny, innit, that Labour doesn’t look to touch the tax ‘relief’ enjoyed by NGOs. Gov.uk sez: “Charities do not pay tax on most types of income as long as they use the money for charitable purposes.” (link) – such as ‘teaching’ our kids the ‘joys of trans sex’, or ‘helping’ illegal migrants to stay in the UK, and never mind the spiralling cost. ‘Human-rights’ solicitors must also earn their crust. 

Clearly, “we” need even more tax money because “we” must also pay for stuff like HS2, Sunak’s attempts notwithstanding. Funny, innit, how there seem to be no declarations of support for HS2 from the opposition. I’m not sure if the Left regards HS2 as a ‘class issue’, given that only ‘fat cats’ would use it, or if they regard it as a work-creation opportunity which also ruins the land which only belongs to rich toffs.

Labour’s tax grab by VAT on public schools isn’t the only class war issue. After all, in this period of ‘cost of living crisis’ it’s only fair to take more money from ‘the rich’: they can afford paying more. Ramming home this message of class ‘war against the rich’ is an op-ed piece in The Times, headlined:

“Rich don’t need an inheritance tax windfall – Rishi Sunak believes death duties are unfair and a brake on aspiration but they raise £7.2bn a year the country needs” (link, paywalled)

And so the home-owning middle classes are suddenly ‘rich’, thanks to the rise in house prices. Clearly, not owning anything nor saving for one’s old age is abhorrent, fat-cattyish, unfair … I only wonder if the writer will gladly hand over the taxes on her inheritance, assuming she has parents who’ve not been on bennies all their lives.

I leave you with another lovely ‘report’ – on shoplifting. We’ve learned that shoplifting has become ‘a thing’, that supermarkets need security people to protect their shelves. I’m sure you’ll be glad to hear that it’s not just ‘teh poor’ who shoplift but also ‘middle class wimmin who do it ‘for the thrill’ (link). How dare they blacken the image of the shop-lifting poor who only steal because they need the food!

That’s all I have for today. I pray for the strength and courage to open the MSM pages tomorrow … Have a good day.