Written by Mary Curran
With Input on Constitutional Issues from the Coordinator of Democracy Defined, Kenn d’Oudney
~~oo~~
At this time when the treasonous claim of “parliamentary sovereignty” is all too often heard, the English (cf. British) Constitution’s authors and the People’s forefathers, common and ennobled, knew, understood, defined and prescribed within the 1215 Great Charter and its subsequent (early) statutory re-iterations, the sole peaceful means known to humankind for annihilating tyranny and establishing Equal Justice for all. This is through the implementation of the long-proven-effective emancipatory mechanism, Judicium Parium (pronounced joo-diss ee-oom) to which we now refer as the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury; or for short as, Trial by Jury (proper noun, capitalised).
Thereafter the reins of power passed from Parliament to political parties and party machines, then to civil servants and the Cabinet, then finally to Globalists and International bankers. “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws,” is attributed to Mayer Amschel Bauer, 1744-1812. He took the name ‘Rothschild’ (‘red shield’) and ‘founded’ the usurious bankers’ ‘House of Rothschild’. Political parties are subject to the caprice and covert dominion of those who finance them. Our Liblabtory MPs do not represent our interests; they serve their party as salesmen for their package of policies, under pain of being deselected.
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” — Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France. Ref. The Money Masters text and video, Bill Still & His Honour Justice Patrick Carmack Esq. See Democracy Defined: The Manifesto ISBN 902-1902848280.
They call that “democracy” and say we can’t complain because we voted for them. Not true; we have been defrauded and something has been mis-sold to us as “the will of the people.” This has reached its climax in the current “Covid” tyranny which, I like to think, is not the will of the people. Government is getting away with evil rules; statutes that trample on our inalienable common law rights and Magna Carta which provides explicit protections to all citizens (not just to the ‘barons’ challenging King John. The latter is widely disseminated disinformation antithetical to the British Constitution). This situation has been developing for centuries. Contributory factors are: Ideas originating in the French Revolution; these are now taught to schoolchildren here instead of Magna Carta and Common Law. The idea of “the divine right of kings” has been mimicked by the perfidious notion of “parliamentary sovereignty.” The quality of the representatives depends so much on the awareness and mentality of the electors. Suffrage in the hands of the populace is a useful protection of We the People, but only so when it is put into effect with reliably trustworthy methods, starting with scrutinised personal presentation and signature of paper ballots (no digital or at-distance voting)… Without effective social resistance since Victorian times at least, statists have relentlessly promulgated the storied Marxist and National Socialist ‘belief’ that the demand for the State to “do more” is a “bottom-up” movement. This duplicitous construct is intended to camouflage the ulterior motive driving the predatory clandestine clique’s bank-owning principals; men who seek absolute global socio-political hegemony.
Nevertheless, the average man and woman now sees the nefarious behind-the-scenes shenanigans for what they are: de facto, they are source of our intended Orwellian subjugation and psychological, if not physical, incarceration; viz. the “Great Reset”; UN Agendas 21 & 30. This has led to the present grotesque total State interference in every cranny of our lives: Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago revisited. Separation of powers between the Head of State (Constitutionally-constrained Executive Monarchy), transient Administrations (i.e., PM, Cabinet, Legislature, MPs; Lords), and the Judiciary, has become more and more eroded. Statutes passed arbitrarily by the executive now replace those formerly debated in Parliament in accordance with common law principles; the legislature has been sidelined. And nowadays, the judiciary suppresses the Constitution’s Trial by Jury Justice System. Under the Illegality of the Status Quo, the judiciary is not answerable to the People. On the contrary, judges always side with the majority in the legislature for the judges are subject to the legislators by impeachment, and on whom they depend for lucrative salaries and careers.
Since Victorian times the Monarchy has progressively become weaker, letting itself be dominated by a self-serving Party System. Not the Monarch as before, nowadays The Party machine selects ministers. Ministers are driven by advisers, lobbyists, globalists and Cabinet civil servants. The Cabinet’s original function was to provide a cabinet setting to coordinate policies across various departments, but now everything is being merged under their control: military, security, health, criminal justice, etc.
Parliament once grilled, warned and advised ministers, but no longer. One may ask whether there is now any ethical or lawful basis for ministers of the Crown to continue serving. The highly susceptible party system has caused much of this breakdown.
Mary. That is an extraordinary piece of research. Thankyou for sharing it with us all. It is the sort of information that once upon a time we might have expected to see produced by a decent and honourable investigative journalist. But as they no longer seem to exist it is great that we have people like you! Your work has triggered off a great debate and opened up the eyes of some of us to facts we might not otherwise have come across easily. I salute your tenacity!
Many thanks Frederica; but I did get help with it ! I think however that whoever takes the credit, the important thing is getting at the truth of how we got into our present catastrophic mess , so that if we by some miracle get a chance to escape it and stop it happening again, we’ll be ready.
Excellent Mary. Shows much research that I know you have been doing.
One problem I am aware of, is that Statute Law overrides our traditional Common Law rights that we thought were in some way ‘safe’.
I’m thinking now of getting out of the E.U.. I’m wondering whether that was the thinking behind Gerrard Batten telling us we should repeal the 1972/3 Treaty of Rome that took us in. That was the only sure way to get us out because it would immediately nullify all the statute laws that depended on it.
Somehow I have great distrust of this government’s declaration that they were removing all mention of E.U. in those laws. Surely that just makes them our statutes so therefore MORE binding than they were.
More generally, you are so right that our whole Constitution has been undermined. I’m sure you are also right in your analysis of how it has been done.
How to put it right is beyond me. Except may be chipping away at the problem a bit at a time MAY work – eventually.
Interesting that you mention the EU. One thing which concerns me is the likelihood of ongoing military cooperation which is never openly discussed. A nation needs a robust defence capability to be sure of its remaining independent. In my view, not having any particular military knowledge, it does appear that our military is way below the necessary numbers.
It’s deliberate. TPTB are busy” taking all our teeth out”. and are more interested in turning our military-security resources against us the people.
I agree that is likely Mary.
Jack I’m sure you’re right! Our military does seem to have been reduced to ridiculously low levels. I suspect that this is deliberate because we were expected (and may still be so for all I know) to become part of and dependent upon the European Army. I don’t believe that Boris was ever really a ‘leaver’. Most of the government is ‘remain’ at heart. I’m sure we are expected to re-join in the fullness of time!
That is why we must work with friends in Europe to bring about the demise of the EU. Whilst ever it exists we are at risk from the rejoiners.
P.S. Particularly relevant is that Magna Carta is not now taught to children in it’s proper place and importance.
If that’s not Cultural Marxism I don’t know what is.
“Somehow I have great distrust of this government’s declaration that they were removing all mention of E.U. in those laws. Surely that just makes them our statutes so therefore MORE binding than they were”.
I used to think that Brexit would mean more control over our laws etc since it would mean we only had to suit ourselves; as opposed to also having to suit most of the other 27 states. I don’t think I anything like appreciated the hold the globalists have over us, or that that the EU is really just a middleman between us and the globalists? I think TMay was being very cynical when she said Brexit means Brexit.
Continued (over word count?)
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 was an enabling act allowing certain unconstitutional measures in a national catastrophe, although there was requirement to debate them first. Govt have criminally IMHO bypassed this requirement through dubiously using as Enabling Act, a 1984 Health Act which addressed only the quarantining etc of sick, infectious , symptomatic people. Hence whatever statutes they feel like inflicting on us, no questions asked. Pure skulduggery.
Mary it is worth mentioning how Hitler became the dictator of Germany. They introduced in 1933 the Enabling
Act. See what that allowed them to do for 15 years. The Maastricht Treaty is also an Enabling Act and this makes
the Commission completely unaccountable to 450 million people.
Absolutely. history repeating itself
Hear hear Graham. I’ve just been reading about Maastricht.
Mary correction, I should have said Lisbon Treaty.
I’ve completely lost the thread of where we are treaty -wise at this moment in time; in limbo I think? . The Brexit Transition period having ended and the Trade and Cooperation Treaty aka Agreement not yet ratified. The purpose of the latter being to get us oven ready to slide back into the EU at the earliest opportunity.
To clarify what I meant here when I said that “I’ve completely lost the thread of where we are treaty -wise at this moment in time ”
I know the overall picture of course; but specifically re statutes being passed now, how are these being “enabled?”
Pauline I`ve returned to your comment here, because, correct me if I`m wrong, you wrote
“One problem I am aware of, is that Statute Law overrides our traditional Common Law rights that we thought were in some way ‘safe’”
I don`t recall seeing any rebuttal of your statement anywhere yet but, not that I know that much,
it sounds disastrous to me and in effect negatives all Mary`s efforts to persuade us we have stone bonking rights under Common Law.
Unless those statutes must not be operated with malice aforethought
Perhaps somebody will explain.
Greetings, Roger Turner.
As you say, “Perhaps somebody will explain,” then I shall reiterate for you what I posted to Pauline Baxter.
We note you say “our whole Constitution has been undermined.” Indeed, that is the case, but because the famous Articles of Common Law which comprise our world-respected model 1215 Great Charter Constitution Magna Carta are ‘undermined’ and transgressed by transient groups of politicians’ arbitrary statutes (i.e., the Common Law Crime of Tyranny) does not mean that the transgression is lawful or legal.
It is not only incorrect in fact, but also a capitulation of the moral high ground to say, “Statute Law overrides our traditional Common Law rights.” Moreover, regarding other comments below, you will be interested to see how restoration of the constitutional rule of law dissolves the de facto counterfeit National Debt. These phenomena are explained in the two-sided text of the flier freely downloadable from near the top of the webpage shown on this link:
https://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm
Further to the above, the specific Legal Mechanism by which We the People hold government to the Principles of Liberty and Equal Justice for All is straightforward and set out in the single-sheet, two-sided flier freely downloadable from this link:
https://www.democracydefined.org/EIS4_Why_Is_Trial_by_Jury_Important.pdf
Roger,
Those two brief leaflets can be downloaded and circulated to friends, family and folk who seek to restore the former exemplary British Justice System and rule of law.
Kenn d’Oudney, Coordinator.
CAMPAIGN TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF LAW.
http://www.democracydefined.org
Greetings, Pauline Baxter.
We note you say “our whole Constitution has been undermined.” Indeed, that is the case, but because the famous Articles of Common Law which comprise our world-respected model 1215 Great Charter Constitution Magna Carta are ‘undermined’ and transgressed by transient groups of politicians’ arbitrary statutes (i.e., the Common Law Crime of Tyranny) does not mean that the transgression is lawful or legal.
It is not only incorrect in fact, but also a capitulation of the moral high ground to say, “Statute Law overrides our traditional Common Law rights.” Moreover, regarding other comments below, you will be interested to see how restoration of the constitutional rule of law dissolves the de facto counterfeit National Debt. These phenomena are explained in the two-sided text of the flier freely downloadable from near the top of the webpage shown on this link:
https://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm
Further to the above, the specific Legal Mechanism by which We the People hold government to the Principles of Liberty and Equal Justice for All is straightforward and set out in the single-sheet, two-sided flier freely downloadable from this link:
https://www.democracydefined.org/EIS4_Why_Is_Trial_by_Jury_Important.pdf
Kenn d’Oudney. Coordinator.
CAMPAIGN TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RULE OF LAW.
http://www.democracydefined.org
Excellent article Mary.
Great article! The relationship between governments and bankers is something that we should talk about more often and in more detail. I’m tempted to write a series of articles myself on this subject.
Although people are waking up to the reality of the systems that we live under, there are still far too many people that don’t have a clue, things will not get better until enough people wake up.
flyer – relationship between governments and bankers
I wonder what’s happening in Greece? A couple of years ago, Greece was borrowing money from the banks because it was in debt. When it got the money, it paid the interest on its bank loans (more or less all of it) back to the banks. Is it still a constantly increasing unpayable debt?
All Western countries, in fact most countries worldwide are doing exactly the same thing. No country that is part (most of them) of the central banking system will ever pay off their debts, it’s just that most of us in the West still,for now have a better credit rating than Greece.
Think Weimar Germany but on a global scale, what is brewing is untold human misery and likely famine on a global scale. The days of these things being contained like in Weimar Germany, Zimbabwe and a whole host of other places throughout history are long gone thanks to globalisation, global banking systems and global politics.
I remember being directed on here to (I think) “The new chartist movement” where there was an article written about the economic solution Lloyd George took which was creating something called “the Bradbury Bank” which I gathered was a method of re-valuing the £
Seems that LG realised the country would be increasing getting into overwhelming debt, just like now, so they decided to value the pound on the International “worth” of the nation
So many billions industry and buildings
Plus
So many billions all the total worth of labour.
Apparently if we did this today our total “worth” might be about £30 trillion whereas our present debt is about £1.5 trillion hey presto we are set free and create and spend all we like.
Has anybody else heard of this – I like it, but I don’t suppose it would get us out of the hands of the nasty bankers.
There’s this website also, which I am digesting; and more later
: https://hardwickalliance.org/articles/the-peoples-strategy/chapter-5
Thanks Mary, that was the web site I read before when I think it was you posted a few days ago.
I know my interpretation is a bit garbled, now I have re-read the whole piece.
But in essence, I am very keen to see a new “Bradbury” solution initiated..
There is mention of “Common Law” being invoked
Is there any news on that front?
PS I think we have to think very carefully about UK Column recruitment.
To be quite honest I have looked in on them in the past and they have always seemed very informed, researched to the Nth degree and professional.Yhey`ve been on the go for quite a long time now
But for me lacking…………
Pazazz?????
They bore me silly.
Well yes but :-
Surely by being in the euro and in the EU, Greece’s predicament was different then, to our position now.
Something about ‘National Debt’ never has been paid off and never will be. Also that national debt is owed to ourselves. It is held by our National Bank which we own.
I don’t understand how global banking systems can force us to repay them for all this debt we as a nation have incurred.
Though I can quite see this rather depends on what sort of ‘government’ we have.
P.S. Perhaps it’s to do with the I.M.F., which I do not understand.
I think you have to go back to that article, was its Classical Liberal who wrote about the Bank of International settlement and the meeting of international bankers every 6 weeks to set and allocate rates for their masters the big bankers like JPMorgan and Rothschilds and how money is created by lending nothing of substance twice, calling it money, charging interest on it etc.
I didn’t fully understand it then, but somehow the international debt is owed to ourselves doesn’t ring with me.
If our economy collapsed, how could we re-establish ourselves out of money we owed?
I read somewhere that their plan was; re individuals at least and probably countries as well, to pull the rug; then grant debt forgiveness . But the price to be total cooperation with New World Order?
Hang on. What U.K. has now is National Debt. I’ve never heard of us having anything called International Debt.
That’s why as far as I can see we only owe money to ourselves.
What is this ‘Quantum Financial System’ I keep hear about? It is supposed to be gradually replacing the current system and to be a great deal better for the people, but I have no clear idea about it?
Sonya – I’ve heard about this Quantum Financial System, some of the claims made about it are a bit fanciful and I’ll believe it when I see it.
Look at the US government debt trajectory. At the time of the 2008 financial crisis, the US government via the Federal Reserve printed seven hundred billion dollars and called it Quantitative Easing; counterfeiting and a crime to you and me.
Today the US government debt is around thirty trillion and rising by a trillion in a very short time and this is accelerating rapidly. While most developed countries in the world are in the same boat, the US is still the World Reserve Currency and the US is bankrupt and only exists on debt, the UK is no better off.
This will not end well for us ordinary folk, a certain few will be extraordinarily wealthy as a result. We will need a new system but the turmoil coming will be catastrophic.