Written by Mary Curran
With Input on Constitutional Issues from the Coordinator of Democracy Defined, Kenn d’Oudney
~~oo~~
Editor’s note: This is the final segment of a two-part series. You can read the first part right here on Independence Daily.
Parliamentarians seek to inherit the demented dogma of despots: “the divine right of kings!” by Mary Curran with Input on Constitutional Issues from the Coordinators of www.democracydefined.org Part Two: Boris Johnson gets likened to King Charles the First but the situation is different now. His strings are pulled by globalist bank-owners; multi-billionaires who are obscenely rich from the fraudulent global banking system. The bank-owners believe they are in the final stages of the process of taking over political establishments across most of the non-Communist world.
A perusal of DEMOCRACY DEFINED: The Manifesto ISBN 978-1902848280 shows that the solution to the present arbitrary, unconstitutional governance (i.e., the judicable Common Law Crime of Tyranny) would be a majority of Parliamentary MPs (specifically, Independent Candidates running on the Restoration Amendment (statute) Program** dedicated to restoring We the People’s secular, timeless Common Law Trial by Jury Justice System). This is defined and inscribed into the world-respected secular Great Charter of English Liberties as the sole legitimate justice system for all causes (lawsuits), civil, criminal and fiscal.
Judicium Parium, the Trial by Jury Justice System, is revered at home and respected abroad as the finest form of law enforcement ever devised. Trial by Jury is the historically-proven foremost egalitarian means by which the population is emancipated from all unjust laws and arbitrary governance. **See one-page, double-sided flyer’s Summary of the Restoration Program on this link.
As with the Head of State, Lords and all Commoners, the Constitution subjects all who form or work for government to liability to prosecution at Common Law Trial by Jury for any Acts of Malice Aforethought, mens rea1; definitive crime at Common Law. Legem Terræ restored and re-installed “in perpetuity” the then already longstanding entitlement (right) of any Citizen commoner (individual or multiple plaintiffs) to prosecute for crimes any other commoner cost-free at a Common Law Trial by Jury; viz. Articles Thirty-Six, Thirty-Nine, Forty and Sixty-One. This is the principal, but not the only, Constitutional mechanism by which the population is emancipated.
- Any ‘act’ means not only legislation but also physical acts.
Trial by Jury is not the ‘preserve’ of the government prosecution service (CPS; DAs) and legal profession. No indeed! Following Restoration, cost-free prosecution of infractions of Legem Terræ Common Law by commoners in government can be brought directly to a Trial by Jury by Writ of Inquisition following Plaint lodged by any commoner2.
- See Articles Thirty-Six and Forty; Convenor’s Summons.
The powers-that-be don’t want us to know about this inalienable right! It is a safeguard against tyranny since juries have the Common Law power both to prosecute and to annul prosecutions of bad laws. TPTB have already cheated us of the Juror’s Powers, Procedures, Rights and Duty in trials, and deny Trial by Jury altogether for supposedly trivial offences like non-payment of a fine. Doubtless, they plan to go further until it vanishes altogether. Their excuse is implausible:
It is an unforgivable duplicitous fallacy often repeated by politicians and the lawyers and judges who represent them, that Trial by Jury “clogs up the courts and takes up too much time and expense.” The truth is that the government judiciary suppress the real Trial by Jury, by all means, possible because it empowers citizens to annul enforcement of legislation at trial—something which not even judges can do. This is put into effect by a Juror or Jurors simply finding the accused Not Guilty, Unanimity being requisite to find ‘guilt’ in Common Law Trial by Jury. Sovereignty of the ‘ordinary’ citizen as Juror over the law derives from the People’s Supreme Courts of Constitutional Trial by Jury; and with it comes unconscionable statists’ ulterior fear of, and hatred for, Trial by Jury.
The mass of malicious, vexatious, partisan, venal, money-motivated and criminogenic (crime engendering) legislation extant today (statutes and by-laws), may be annulled, rendered unenforceable, and mandated for expunction by due process of Trial by Jury. From the aforegoing phenomena, the number of government prosecutions and court cases — and related expense to the taxpayer — is greatly reduced. According to a restored Constitutional rule of law, repeal of bad laws works like this:
A jury acquits the accused on grounds that the accusation is based on a bad law. The accused can then file Plaint, at no cost to him or herself, against the powers-that-be who instituted (to wit, legislators, Ministers of State, Home Office; the bureaucracy) and upheld that law (judiciary, legal profession, Law Society). If they fail to compensate the falsely accused and persist in attempting to prosecute the law (refusing to repeal the law), he or she can take a criminal lawsuit denominating them personally liable for malice, and even treason.
The situation now is very bleak, but I think spreading the educational word is relatively simple. Trial by Jury is long-proven the effective solution to rampant tyranny. The criterial Concept of Malice Aforethought is straightforward, easily perceived in people’s behaviour (however complex the evidence and legislative terminology) and well understood by both the illiterate and the intellectual. The genuine Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury remains the only (peaceful) means known to humankind for holding Administrations — and those behind them — to the Principles of Liberty and Equal Justice.
While the jury system is ideal we shouldn’t underestimate the corrupting power the mainstream media has had in corrupting public opinion.
So, why have I never seen it used ?? There must be a million opportunities daily.
Thanks Mary as an illiterate ( as opposed to professional in Constitutional Law, or even any other law for that matter)
I’ve finally got it! At least, I think I have.
I had heard about habeus corpus and the right to trial by jury and the production of my body within such and such a period and its difference from The Continental System of Corpus Juris.
But I had no notion that I and my fellow grass rooters had the rights as you have outlined of being able to bring a case against those who oppress me, be they high or low, based on malicious intent and at no cost to myself..
Sounds wonderful, why aren’t we bringing cases already?
Could it be, like me, ignorance that I had such a right?
Could it be, that it is difficult (impossible) to prove malicious intent.?
Could it be that amongst those who “know” there is no reason to alter the system that operates so sweetly in their conspiracy to “fleece” those who they regard as grass root ignorant apathetic peasants.?
If it is the latter, won’t we cheer when it creeps up and bites them in the backside too, as it most surely will.
The only thing I don’t understand, is that whatever happens in the future, there will always be two “worlds”, for instance I can never envisage the Muslim world joining the Western style world.
Like the poor “they will always be with us” ( and that’s using with in the restricted sense of about us)
“…why aren’t we bringing cases already?”
The answer lies in Flyer’s and my comments below. We need first to get rid of the turkeys who wont vote for Christmas. A VERY tall order I know full well.
Plus few people know about these rights.
PS I’m not an expert either, not at all, I’m just interested in the subject !)
PS
This website suggests telling some of the said turkeys, that we know how Britain might be saved, and asking why they won’t do it. They will ignore us but they wont be able to say afterwards that they didn’t know….
https://hardwickalliance.org/articles/the-peoples-strategy/chapter-5/
Interesting and thought provoking article – thank you.
A Jury can get things wrong and be overwhelmed by complicated legalese. Much better to appoint friendly judges that are experts in delivering the ‘politically’ correct decisions. Thanks Tony.
Matt-up-North, It should be remembered that the juror’s duty is UNCOMPLICATED: ‘guilt’ of a crime can only be pronounced where the accused’s act was a deliberate, premeditated one of malice aforethought. Similar judgements are a daily fact of life in commonplace human interactions. We make such appraisals frequently… “Is this person behaving in a way that is dishonest or malign?” “Is that person telling the truth?” “Why are they doing that?” “Are these people genuine?” (Note that in the case of one person injuring another innocently or accidentally, the civil law suit and Trial by Jury award appropriate compensation for damages.)
Regardless of the intricacies of evidence and legislation (and it is always for the plaintiff to present a clear case), the contrast between genuine innocence and malicious motivation is easy for jurors to discern.
Only ulterior mens rea, i.e., criminal intent, lies behind politicians, judges and others advocating denial of Trial by Jury and the handing over of cases to the statists’ and authoritarians’ method of injustice: the ‘trial-by-government-judge’.
Kenn d’Oudney. Coordinator. DemocracyDefined.org
For years I wondered why nobody ever won a court case against the EU. Germany was a good example when European Central Bank money printing requirements contravened German law; the EU won.
During Brexit, our escape was almost foiled by the courts, the Supreme Court specifically, they always rule in the interests of the EU.
In the US, in the face of increasingly obvious election fraud, the courts at all levels refused to hear the evidence.
Every institution in the Western world has been so corrupted that the only solution is the removal of said institutions by force if necessary. What was originally a soft coup in the US has now become a hard coup: watch out for imminent fireworks.
If you’re waiting for anyone in our government, judiciary or any other major institution to act in favour of we the people, forget it, it isn’t going to happen, stop even listening to them.
As I’ve said for years: ‘the more extreme you let a situation become, the more extreme are the solutions and now here we are. The only available solutions are very extreme and the longer we leave it the more extreme they will become; either that or resign yourself and you children to their unfortunate fate. Our ancestors wouldn’t have accepted this.
Absolutely. I realise that we would first need to see off our existing totally corrupt establishment , a very tall order, before even trying to effect such measures . But we must be ready, if the chance miraculously presents itself, to try to ensure that totalitarian laws, fines etc never happen again. (Hoping for this is the only thing that keeps me sane ! )
The corruption of the West has been developing gradually over many decades; didn’t one of the Frankfurt School say that our enemies , at that time simply the Communists, will wait until the West becomes so corrupt that it stinks, and falls into their hands like a rotten apple.
The name you are searching for is, Wlli Munzenburg.
In the same vein look at the words of Alexander Trachtenberg during the
Communist Party of America jamboree in 1944. Saying how they would
bring the USA down. The Democrats are fully signed up to his philosophy
without even realising it.
Flyer – Have no fear! The long-proven effective solution is non-violent.
If you want to know how We the People assert our democratic rights, have a look at the secular (universally-applicable) FIVE permanent TENETS of our supreme constitutional law which are set out in the flyer accessed near the top of this webpage link:
https://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm