Running out of weapons while unable to restore our stocks

 

After a Bank Holiday it’s always very jolly to note the floundering of our MSM when they have to ‘report the news’ without the prescribed spin from government. Since the “sources” and “senior sources” in No 10 and Whitehall have been away for that well-deserved break we’re being served with sob stories or ‘spy stories’. Just check out here the BBC’s daily compilation.

This morning I’ll give you two reasons why I’m shunning the “war reporting” our MSM are splattering across their pages. Firstly, there’s a nice little title, in red even, at the top of the DT’s paper edition this morning, saying that ‘Putin is pressing the PM for prisoner swap’. However, there’s no such headline, never mind an article, in the online edition. Odd, isn’t it!

Secondly, just scanning the pictures the various ‘war reports’ publish online, it’s evident that our armchair reporters use videos constantly published by Russian journalists on the social platform ‘telegram’. They then interpret the images they take from those videos in such a way that the Ukrainians are winning or are at the very least heroic defenders against all odds.

The point is that these writers are accessing Russian videos made by Russian reporters who are embedded with the various Russian military groups. Our MSM hacks surely also have access to machine translators, so they must be aware that they are, weelll, let’s call it: ‘misrepresenting’ the facts. If that’s not a clear indication that they’re feeding us propaganda, I don’t know what is.

We’re also told, yet again, how we and the USA are sending huge numbers of weapons and ammunition to the Ukraine. Anyone who only reads our MSM or watches our TV reports is clearly unaware that on a daily basis Russian forces keep destroying these weapons as soon as they arrive in the Ukraine. 

There was an article in Bloomberg last week (link), reporting that the West is running out of ammunition and weapons to send to Kiev. The headline alone is hair-raising: 

“Ukraine War Is Depleting America’s Arsenal of Democracy – Western allies face a choice: Send more weapons to Kyiv or save their stockpiles for their own defense.” (link)

“Arsenal of Democracy” – does that mean the USA’s weapons are gentle and good, killing for ‘a good cause’, while Russians and by extension Chinese ones are bad because they’re not from an ‘arsenal of democracy’? How … interesting!

Many bloggers have been analysing this report from a military point of view, such as how much ammunition the Ukraine would need on a daily basis to keep fighting Russian troops. Here’s the latest, by an American. Weren’t we told at the start of this war that Russia would run out of ammunition and fuel within a week? Now, nearly 8 weeks into this war, it doesn’t look as if it’s Russia which has to scrape the bottom of the armament barrel. 

Leaving all those calculations to proper military experts there are certain points in the Bloomberg article which deserve emphasising. There’s for example the point that the USA, the mightiest economy of the world, surely can just increase their armament production, correct? Not so fast – see this (my emphasis):

“In the world wars of the last century, America’s unmatched manufacturing base ultimately powered it to victory. But today, replenishing the free world’s arsenal might not be so easy. American economic leadership is no longer based primarily on manufacturing. Shortages of machine tools, skilled labor and spare production capacity could slow a wartime rearmament effort. The U.S. can’t quickly scale up production of Stinger missiles for Ukraine, for example, because the workforce needed to do so no longer exists. American stockpiles of key weapons are smaller than one might imagine, partly because of production constraints and partly because most of the Pentagon’s roughly $750 billion budget goes to manpower, health care and things other than bullets and bombs.” (link)

That can certainly be said for our and the EU countries’ armament production as well. Also, our Armed Forces spend their budget not so much on hardware but on ‘things other than bullets and bombs’, such as ‘diversity’, as we learned a few weeks ago.

There is one more constraint which Bloomberg’s reporter hasn’t mentioned. Thanks to sanctions we, including the USA, simply no longer have access to the raw materials and energy resources needed to produce the sophisticated weapons we’re giving away. I’ll mention one other point: thanks to green crappery, our energy supply is in such dire straits that even if we’re not going on a ‘war production’ drive, we’d have to face rationing, as a certain Lord Frost explained here.

And let’s not even think about how “we” would accomplish all that ‘war production’, rationing included, when three quarters of our civil serpents are still clinging to WFH so that Mr Rees-Mogg wrote

“[…] to all secretaries of state to say they must send a “clear message” to officials about ending the work from home culture and urge them to ensure that taxpayer-funded offices are at “full capacity”.” (paywalled link)

By autumn, when the home energy bills will start to bite, we might see two things: either those WFH civil serpents will demand a ‘WHF heating supplement’ – or they’ll creep back into their offices because they’ll be heated. 

And finally, two interesting little pieces regarding Macron. One is a report by RT, on how France is setting up a NATO battle group in Romania, near the border with Ukraine (link). The other is by Reuters: 

“French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday that his dialogue with Russian President Vladimir Putin has stalled after mass killings were discovered in Ukraine.” (link)

One has to feel for that wannabe Napoleon – not! It’s hard to look like a good little NATO poodle on the one hand while trying to play at being a ‘peace negotiator’ on the other, and all that while knowing full well that Putin knows full well what Macron is up to, election campaign included. 

I leave you with recommending another text. It’s very long, describing how a Tory warmongering MP, Mr Ellwood, is getting support from Labour and the Left. If you wondered why Labour is for ‘moar war’ rather than criticising the ongoing militaristic adventure of the current PM, wonder no longer: the Left is for war with Russia on behalf of the ‘working classes’!

You really couldn’t make it up.